Another kiss on the cheek and deep bow to Islamic nations:
CBS News reports: President Barack Obama's advisers plan to remove terms such as "Islamic radicalism" from a document outlining national security strategy and will use the new version to emphasize that the U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism, counterterrorism officials say.
So, the Obama administration refuses to “view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism”, hmmm? Because the ideological source of the hundreds of terror attacks per week does not wear a Nazi uniform or an Attila-the-Hun hat and cannot be precisely pointed out by Grandma, we will play blind and stupid with our verbiage. Not bright.
No, no, no. That is not the reason for failing to identify the world-wide ideology of Islam as the root of terror. The reason is the regrettable merging of Obama’s affinity for Islam with the cultural diversity-loving liberal agenda of our current crop of hallucinating pot-smoking ex-hippie leaders. Obama has demonstrated his defense and promotion of Islam in numerous speeches and writings, both here and in the many Islamic nations he visited.
What verbiage would he wish to substitute for “Islamic radicalism”, “Islamic Jihad”, and “war on terror?” Might he resort to terms such as “devout behavior”, “inner struggle”, or “exercise in international relations?” Will those phrases be sufficiently bland for our Islam-pandering president?
Here are the words we should be using to identify what we are up against:
- Islamic-inspired fascism
- Islamic-inspired terror
- Islamic-motivated violence
- Islamic-motivated intolerance
- Islamic supremacism
- Islamic anti-Semitism
- War on Islamic terror
- Refer to Islam as an “intolerant, fascist ideology”, not a “religion”
These words and phrases concisely define what the west is up against much better than the vague, misdirecting verbiage Obama is hiding behind.
Even the words “Islamic Radicalism” are inadequate. What inspires the radicalism? Which of the worlds’ religious ideologies inspire at least 10% of their adherents to directly support or commit acts of terror, with most of the rest applauding the result? Is it the Hindus? The Buddhists? The Christians? The Jews? Even the atheists? NO! It is the Islamic ideology that inspires 120 million from their 1.2 billion to wage their terror against the infidel. And worse, the majority if not nearly all Muslims support the intolerant fascist outcome of intended Islamic dominance.
We need to clearly identify the ideological inspiration for the radicalism: Islam.
Our president denies we are at war. So it follows that he ignores the only way to win a war: Know thy enemy! 9-11 with the applauding Islamic masses apparently wasn’t an adequate introduction. And our Islam-inspired President is doing his damndest to assure the real enemy remains unknown.