Friday, January 30, 2015

Obama’s hope for America…

                                                …driven by a third world mentality

Remember Obama’s lament awhile ago when he said if he had a son he would look like Treyvon Martin?  Yup, a young man who was suspended three times for truancy, graffiti, carrying burglary tools, suspected of attacking a school bus driver and a doper (his Skittles, tea, and Robitussin concoction).

And a few months later, Obama once again inferred that if he had a son he would look like Michael Brown, aka, “Gentle Giant” and used his racism to condemn the police.  The “gentle giant” was better known in the ‘hood for groovin’ on very explicit rap songs praising drugs, drinking, ho’s & murder – and later best known for robbing a convenience store and assaulting a cop.



And why not?  Obama relates to these “Obama son” role models because of his own earlier years…not merely a one time inhaler, but a fully engaged pot smoker.


Obama, and apparently those who voted for him, aspire to not merely taking the side of the disadvantaged, but taking the side of our corrupt, lawless underbelly of humanity.  Instead of promoting great role models for our nation, he embraces the opposite examples of what destroys a nation.

No wonder this photo is making the rounds on the internet…

Does our electorate really share Obama's vision for America, or am I merely experiencing a bad dream?

Why am I a pessimist and cynic about America’s future?  Here’s why:  Why on God’s green earth would a man with Obama’s beliefs and attitude toward our nation be elected – twice.  There were no secrets.  His books gave ample evidence of who he was.  His associations were well known.  His appointees, as well as Democratic candidates likely to run to take his place (Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Howard Dean, or Elizabeth Warren)  share his world view (although their campaign words will disingenuously try to distance themselves).   I will not be surprised this time if our electorate remains ignorant enough to elect one of these to carry on Obama’s quest for third world status of our nation.

Oh, and by the way, let us not forget Obama’s  affinity (and apparently over 50% of the electorate’s) for strengthening our enemies, the most recent example being his facilitation of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, HERE.  Just as his domestic policies promote wealth redistribution and divisive “social justice” for his bizarre “sons”, his foreign policies promote power redistribution by rewarding our enemies (rabid Islamist states) and dissing our allies (Israel and others).

All driven by a third world mentality.  And the democratic party and most of the electorate are chomping at the bit to continue these policies beyond 2016. 

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Islamist anti-Semites called out by New York Democrat–finally…

If only…

If only more political leaders would recognize the evil of Islamic anti-Semites, who, by the way, are also rabidly anti-Infidel – you and me. 

Pro-Palestinian Muslim demonstrators interrupted a New York City Council meeting last week.  And what were they demonstrating against?  A proposed resolution of Council to commemorate the closing of Auschwitz 70 years ago.  And these demonstrators were MODERATE Muslims.  Ha!  They are just Muslims following their religion.

The Muslim kiddies are taught this, not by “radicals” but by Islam.  While the PA has often been held up as a "moderate" alternative to Hamas by many in the West, … the poem's reference to Jews as "monkeys and pigs" hails from the anti-Semitic Islamic tradition of the Quran, in which three different chapters say Allah turned Jews into "apes" and "swine" for disobeying him (Suras 2:65, 5:60 and 7:166).  More HERE.

Does this salute look familiar?   Islamic Hezbollah folks ther  History is beginning to repeat itself.



Below is a two minute video of a spirited reaction of New York City Councilman David G. Greenfield to that Palestinian demonstration protesting a Council resolution commemorating the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, site of the annihilation of 1.1 million people.

And understand this:  It is not just Middle Eastern Muslims (Palestinians, Iranian, Iraqis, Syrians, Saudis, Turks, and other Islamic nations) that surround Israel that are anti-Semitic.  The “religion” of Islam itself is anti-Semitic.  It is Islam’s founder, it is Islamic “holy books”, it is Islamic history, it is today’s Islamic leaders and teachers, and it is Islamic actions that demonstrate Islam’s anti-Semitic doctrine.

And this is not limited just to the Middle East.

Here is the kicker.  There are more Muslims living outside of the Middle East than within.  Muslims in Indonesia, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and other nations outside the Middle East may currently have a supine attitude toward their religion compared to the more devout in the Middle East.  But they already identify with Islam – with or without the hate, violent jihad, and anti-Semitism Islam teaches.  They may not yet practice all that Islam commands.  But it is just a matter of time before Islamic leaders, whether native or imported, open their eyes to all that Islam commands of the followers of Muhammad.  There are already running battles in several of these non-Middle East Islamic countries between the more devout jihadists and their governments.    And last I checked, Afghanistan is not in the Middle East.

Only two decades ago Muslims in the Middle East were not generally seen as a threat, either.  Islam was not on the radar of 99% of us.  How quickly things can change. Just a matter of time.

In any event, here is the spirited response of Councilman Greenfield to the outrageous demonstration by Islamist Palestinians against the New York City Council’s proposed action to honor the 1.1 million lives taken at Auschwitz.  Listen and be inspired.

If only each of us could spontaneously respond as effectively with the spirit and conviction as the Councilman when faced with the outrageous behavior of evil.

The Councilman can be followed on Twitter at @NYCGreenfield and at

Friday, January 16, 2015

“It’s getting hard to keep up with all these Qur’an-inspired atrocities that have nothing to do with Islam”

The number of atrocities committed by adherents to the “religion of peace” but having nothing to do with Islam is mushrooming (“Mushrooming”:  the cloud to soon be sponsored by people having nothing to do with Islam coming to us as soon as they have the means.)

Pat Condell gives another inspired episode about the mind-numbing denial by our “leaders” that Islam has anything to do with the dozens of jihadist attacks carried out weekly in the name of Islam by declared Muslims.  Enjoy (or not).

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Why gas prices will be below $1.80 soon, and why the long term consequences suck…

HERE is a great article that explains why we have low oil prices, how low they will go, and how long these prices will last.

Short answer:  Oil will go below $30 a barrel and gasoline below $1.50 a gallon.  Saudi Arabia has promised to maintain current production levels to purposely lower prices.  Why?  So Saudi Arabia can maintain its market share by killing competition, especially in the United States.

So those of us hoping for US energy independence to cease funding Islamists who yearn to extend their Islamic caliphate to the US or chop off our heads, it doesn’t look like energy independence will happen any time soon.  The only way I see a potential for the US persevering is for our oil production to be subsidized by our government until we can reduce the cost of production through technological advances.  And that might require 10 years – probably longer.

Conspiracy theory alert:  This has nothing to do with Obama being good buds with the Saudi’s, and partnering to kill the evil fracking business, right?  A twofer for him.

So, break out your burkas ladies.  And men, sharpen your scimitars.  Encourage your kids to learn Arabic.

And we were concerned with having to press “1” for English?  Hurumph!

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Who Enables Benedict Arnold?

Pat Boone makes a compelling argument for Obama being our current day Benedict Arnold (read below).  But I would like to know who enabled our present day Benedict Arnold and why most of us still choose to deny this fact?

 (Thanks to World Net Daily)



A traitor in the White House? If the shoe fits ...

Exclusive: Pat Boone offers 'hypothetical' scenario of treason in nation's highest office

Published: 14 hours ago

“The traitor rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

– Marcus Tullius Cicero, 1st century B.C.

What is treason? Good old Webster’s Dictionary describes it simply as “betrayal of one’s country to an enemy.” And traitor as “one who betrays one’s country, cause, friends, etc.”

I’ve recently read a biography of Benedict Arnold, American history’s most notorious traitor. Though he was beneficiary of our young country’s opportunities and honors, rising through the military to the rank of major general, historians record he was arrogant and impatient with civilian deliberateness and legislative oversight. He courted the favor of British loyalists, angering the patriots – and exhibited such a love and need for money that he lined his pockets with questionable side ventures.

He decided he wasn’t sufficiently appreciated by his fellows and formulated a treasonous plan to crush the Revolution and revenge himself on Congress. When, amazingly, he was given the command of West Point, he plotted with British Gen. Clinton to surrender the fort for 20,000 pounds! The plot was discovered, and Arnold barely managed to escape to England, where he lived out his life as a social outcast … and infamous traitor.

Is it remotely possible such a terrible thing could happen in America today? What would one of our leaders have to do to be accused of treason?

Well, let’s create a purely hypothetical scenario.

Suppose America elects a charismatic young president who makes all kinds of brave promises and sweeps into the White House. This young man not only has little political or governmental experience, but none at all in business or administration. Curiously, his upbringing is never closely examined or evaluated; it’s just assumed that anybody elected president must love America – but this young man had been trained by parents and others to consider this country a colonial oppressor and unfit to be a world leader! In college, by his own autobiographical account, he sought out Marxist professors, in not one but three colleges.

Once elected, he uses his newfound executive authority to seal off all his early school, passport and travel records, lest his true intents be uncovered. He eventually has a fake “copy of a birth certificate” created and exhibited on the White House website, complete with glaring errors that betray its falsehood. Somehow Congress seems mesmerized and intimidated from confronting him, so he creates a phalanx of legislative “czars” to regulate and virtually stifle all business and energy progress, and these “czars” – among them known Muslim and Marxist and homosexual activists – report not to Congress but directly to him!

Having declared that he considered the U.S. Constitution a “flawed” document, he proceeds as president to ride roughshod over the document and its establishment of three separate and equal branches of our government, declaring openly if Congress won’t give him what he wants, he “has a phone and a pen” and will make executive decisions and even change laws he has crammed through the legislature, determined to effectively dismantle the two-party system and the separation-of-powers concept.

Now, theoretically, many might call all this treason. But wait.

Suppose that this increasingly arrogant young man, having become commander in chief of the military, begins to quietly fire and replace full admirals and generals who object to his decisions to withdraw from territories gained by the lives of 4,000 brave young Americans, and to issue more orders that will weaken the whole defense system and cost more young American lives. Treason? Wait …

Suppose this pompous man also appoints an attorney general who announces with him that they not only will enable hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to invade the country – but that they will not enforce the immigration laws themselves! This, knowing that among those undocumented aliens there would certainly be trained enemies of the United States, whose sole purpose for crossing our borders is to destroy the country he had learned to despise as a young man. And what if this attorney general concocts a scheme to furnish thousands of weapons to Mexican drug cartels and potential terrorists? Treason? The case is building.

Now suppose that this Manchurian (or Indonesian) Candidate, never having any business or economic experience, but knowing that one vital reason for America’s world dominance is its giant economy, forces through a weak and compliant Congress decisions that add trillions of dollars of unpayable, inexcusable debt, piling up three times more debt on American taxpayers and businesses than all past presidents combined! In this unthinkable scenario, he is systematically crippling, bankrupting and discrediting his country. And in all of the this, he’s following the plan he had learned from a famous Communist Party organizer.

Now, in this imagined story, we can add the deliberate dividing of the citizens along racial, economic and political lines. We can add his awarding billions of dollars of speculative contracts to party donors and even family friends. We can toss in his leaving his command post while a U.S. ambassador and other Americans are under fire and eventually dying … to pack his bags and fly to Las Vegas for a political fundraiser. A definite Benedict Arnold comparison.

And, to leave no doubt whatsoever, while our nation is slipping into all-out war against inhuman killers who behead innocent people, this pretender in chief makes the personal decision to release known murderers from a military prison and to send them back to the Mideast, all expenses paid and with no penalty for their crimes, to supposedly “rehab” – and then certainly reassume leadership positions with our murderous enemies. No consultation with, or consent from, Congress. Just his own decision, knowing brave young Americans will face these beasts again in a battle to the death. If there’s a clearer definition of treason, I can’t think of it.

All this is theoretical, of course – but I think if such an interloper and subversive impostor were to somehow arise and become our president, if he weren’t eventually exposed, prosecuted and impeached, America should apologize to Benedict Arnold.

And his picture should be posted in Webster’s alongside the words “treason” and “traitor.”

Who is that masked man?


Pat Boone, descendant of the legendary pioneer Daniel Boone, has been a top-selling recording artist, the star of his own hit TV series, a movie star, a Broadway headliner, and a best-selling author in a career that has spanned half a century. During the classic rock & roll era of the 1950s, he sold more records than any artist except Elvis Presley.


Thursday, January 08, 2015

Denial that Jihad is Doctrinally Sound Islam Denies Reality…

But liberals, the ignorant and many conservatives persist in denial.

Here is the latest example of Muslim Jihad denial following the Muslim atrocity in Paris, this by undeniable liberal Howard Dean…

“I stopped calling these people Muslim terrorists. They're about as Muslim as I am," he said. "I mean, they have no respect for anybody else's life, that's not what the Koran says.”

Either Howard is ignorant of the Qur’an and the duality of the Islamic ideology, or he is awkwardly declaring himself Muslim.

France has suffered from the same problem Howard has – Islam denial.

French intelligence had these Muslims on their radar for a number of years.  Pam Geller notes that…

“…questions are being raised about “how Chérif Kouachi, so well known to the police for so many years, and his brother had managed to conceal their intentions. Part of the answer may be that they appear to have moved smoothly between normal immigrant society and an extremist Islamist underground.

“Sounds like there is little difference between “normal” Muslim society versus “extreme Islamist underground.” Did no one in “normal Muslim” society speak, see, or hear anything wrong? if not? Why not?

“His Paris imam urged him to kill American troops in Iraq as it “presented a better outlet for his commitment to jihad.”

- See more at:

There are several things to note here. 

1)  There are more than 2.1 million Muslims in France, an estimated total of 5 to 10 percent of the national population.  France has the largest number of Muslims of any nation in Western Europe.

2)  Muslims will defend and protect other Muslims.

3)  The Muslim imams of France must not be Muslim either, since they urge fellow Muslims to commit Islamic jihad.

Islam goes beyond  attracting merely the lazy and ignorant that tend to flock to the socialist/entitlement culture.  Islam also attracts the misfits, the angry, the disenfranchised and the criminal element of western society.  While every other religion promotes moderation, tolerance, and non-violence as ideals, Islam promotes the opposite.   Islamic ideology, its’ “holy books” and teachings of the imams promote intolerance, hatred, and violence in the name of Islam.  

To quote one commentator regarding the goals and purpose of Islam:

“Not your normal goal or purpose of religion. Islam from it's inception formed a religion that was pseudo-righteous cover for criminal behavior. In Islam, major criminal behaviors are incorporated with a religious nameplate, but are in fact designed to gain overwhelming power by giving the average male Muslim believer fighting in Jihad, control of the infidels he conquers, as a criminal would have over victims in the commission of a crime, and yet the perpetrator of these crimes feels he is doing God's will.

Stolen wealth and sexual debauchery are the rewards that can be had here on earth in Jihad. This formula has given Islam the young male converts it needed to form large armies to conquer all civilizations in Western Asia and many in Europe. It is time to speak boldly against Islam as a religion of peace or even as a religion.”

Yes, “or even as a religion.”  Islam should be treated as a seditious ideology, much like Nazism was during WWII or any perverse cultish movement that desire to infiltrate and radically transform our government and culture.  Islam is even more insidious because of its religious façade which provides cover much as the Trojan Horse of old. 

Howard Dean, like most liberals and even many conservatives in the West, denies this Islamic history and their present day doctrines.  Fools, all.

Will France learn from this?  Will we?

Tuesday, January 06, 2015

The elusive “moderate” Islam…

The media, academia, and politicians claim that moderate Islam predominates in the Muslim world.   They insist “radical” Islam is only in the mind of the Islamophobe.

Reality says otherwise, as Daniel Greenfield elaborates, below.  This is from the website


Daniel Greenfield’s famous, classical chronicle on how Leftist politicians invented “moderate Islam” to make voters accept the import of Muslim voters for the Left. Statistics backing Greenfield’s point here.

Via Dispatch International:

I have been searching for moderate Islam since September 11 and just like a lost sock in the dryer, it was in the last place I expected it to be.

There is no moderate Islam in the mosques or in Mecca. You won’t find it in the Koran or the Hadiths. If you want to find moderate Islam, browse the newspaper editorials after a terrorist attack or take a course on Islamic religion taught by a Unitarian Sociologist wearing fake native jewelry.
You can’t find a moderate Islam in Saudi Arabia or Iran, but you can find it in countless network news specials, articles and books about the two homelands of their respective brands of Islam.

You won’t find the fabled land of moderate Muslims in the east. You won’t even find it in the west. Like all myths it exists in the imagination of those who tell the stories. You won’t find a moderate Islam in the Koran, but you will find it in countless Western books about Islam.

Moderate Islam isn’t what most Muslims believe. It’s what most liberals believe that Muslims believe.

The new multicultural theology of the West is moderate Islam. Moderate Islam is the perfect religion for a secular age since it isn’t a religion at all.
Take Islam, turn it inside out and you have moderate Islam. Take a Muslim who hasn’t been inside a mosque in a year, who can name the entire starting lineup of the San Diego Chargers, but can’t name Mohammed’s companions and you have a moderate Muslim. Or more accurately, a secular Muslim.

An early generation of Western leaders sought the affirmation of their national destinies in the divine. This generation of Western leaders seeks the affirmation of their secular liberalism in a moderate Islam.

Even if they have to make it up.

Without a moderate Islam the Socialist projects of Europe which depend on heavy immigration collapse. America’s War on Terror becomes the endless inescapable slog that the rise of ISIS has once again revealed it to be. Multiculturalism, post-nationalism and Third World Guiltism all implode.

Without moderate Muslims, nationalism returns, borders close and the right wins. That is what they fear.

If there is no moderate Islam, no moderate Mohammed, no moderate Allah, then the Socialist Kingdom of Heaven on Earth has to go in the rubbish bin. The grand coalitions in which LGBT activists and Islamists scream at Jews over Gaza aren’t the future; they’re the Weimar Republic on wheels.

Flash back to Obama in his tan suit wearily saying that he has no strategy for ISIS. The original plan was to capture Osama alive, give him a civilian trial, cut a deal with the moderate Taliban and announce the end of the War on Terror before the midterm elections.

So much for that.

Moderate Islam is a difficult faith. To believe in it you have to disregard over a thousand years of recorded history, theology, demographics and just about everything that predates 1965. You have to ignore the bearded men chopping off heads because they don’t represent the majority of Muslims.

Neither does Mohammed, who did his own fair share of headchopping. The real Islam is a topic that non-Muslims of no faith who hold sacred only the platitudes of a post-everything society are eager to lecture on without knowing anything about it.

Their Islam is not the religion of Mohammed, the Koran, the Hadiths, the Caliphs or its practitioners in such places as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq or Indonesia. Their Islam is a religion that does not exist, but that they fervently believe must exist because without it their way of life is as doomed as the dodo.

They aren’t Muslims. They have no faith in Allah or the Koran. Instead they have faith in the goodness of an Islam that exists without resort to scriptures, theology or deity. This may seem strange to actual believers, but after all their own poor tattered scraps of Christianity or Judaism don’t bother paying too much attention to deities or scriptures except when it comes to cherry-picking quotes about tolerance.

Is it any wonder that they treat Islam the same way?

The true moderate Muslims are secular liberals of loosely Christian and Jewish persuasion who have invented and believe in a moderate Islam that doesn’t exist outside of their own heads. This secular Islam, which values all life, is dedicated to social justice and universal tolerance, is a counterpart of their own bastardized religions. And they are too afraid to wake up and realize that it doesn’t exist.

When American and European leaders insist that Islam has nothing to do with the latest Islamic atrocity, they are not referencing a religion practiced by Muslims, but an imaginary religion that they imagine Muslims must practice because the alternative is the end of everything that they believe in.

Their moderate Islam is light on the details, beyond standing for social justice, fighting Global Warming and supporting gay rights, because it is really multiculturalism wearing a fake beard. When a Western leader claims that the latest batch of Islamic terrorists don’t speak for Islam, he isn’t defending Muslims, he’s defending multiculturalism. He assumes that Muslims believe in multiculturalism because he does.

Moderate Islam is just multiculturalism misspelled. Its existence is a firm article of faith for those who believe in multiculturalism.

Dissuading a believer in moderate Muslims from his invented faith by citing the long trail of corpses or the hateful Hadiths that call for mass murder is futile because these are not the roots of his religion. He doesn’t know what a Hadith is nor does he care. As a social justice man in good standing, he attributes the violent track record of Islam to European colonialism and oppression.

He has never read the Koran. He has read a thousand articles about how Muslims are oppressed at the airport, in Gaza, in Burma and in Bugs Bunny cartoons. They are his new noble savages and he will not hear a word against them. Having colonized their identities in his imagination (despite the marked up copy of Edward Said’s Orientalism that he keeps by his bedside) he treats them as reflections of his ego.

When you say that moderate Muslims don’t exist, you are calling him a bad person. When you challenge Islam, you are attacking multiculturalism and he will call you a racist, regardless of the fact that Islam is as much of a race as Communism, Nazism or the Mickey Mouse Fan Club were races.

The moderate Muslim is an invention of the liberal academic, the secular theologian, the vapid politician and his shrill idiot cousin, the political activist. Like the money in the budgets that underpin their plans and the scientific evidence for Global Warming, he does not exist.

And it is not necessary that he should exist. It is only necessary that we have faith in his existence.

The degraded lefty descendants of Christians and Jews wait for a moderate Muslim messiah who will reconcile the impossibilities of their multicultural society by healing the conflicts between Islam and the West. Until they find him, they have to believe, not in a divinity, but in the moderate Muslim.


All of the above makes even more sense when you review the following:  (thanks to Robert D.):


*The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
*The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
*The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
*The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
*The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
*The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
*The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
*The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
*The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
*The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
*The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
*The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
*The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
*The Beirut U.S. Embassy Bombers were Muslims
*The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
*The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
*The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
*The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
*The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
*The Beirut Marine Barracks Bombers were Muslims
*The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims

*The First World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
*The Bombay, Mumbai, India Attackers were Muslims
*The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
*The Nairobi, Kenya Shopping Mall Killers were Muslims
*The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
*The Sydney, Australia Lindt Cafe Kidnapper was a Muslims
*The Peshawar, Pakistani School Children Killers were Muslims

*The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
*The cop killer in New York City was a Muslim


*Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
*Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
*Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
*Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
*Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
*Christians living with Jews = No Problem
*Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
*Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
*Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
*Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
*Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
*Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
*Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
*Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
*Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
*Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem


*Muslims living with Jews = Problem
*Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
*Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
*Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
*Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
*Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
*Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
*Muslims living with Christians = Problem


***********THE CONSEQUENCES ***************** *
*They're not happy in Gaza
*They're not happy in Egypt
*They're not happy in Libya
*They're not happy in Iran
*They're not happy in Iraq
*They're not happy in Yemen
*They're not happy in Pakistan
*They're not happy in Syria
*They're not happy in Lebanon
*They're not happy in Nigeria
*They're not happy in Kenya
*They're not happy in Sudan
*They're not happy in Morocco
*They're not happy in Afghanistan

*They're happy in Australia
*They're happy in Belgium
*They're happy in France
*They're happy in Holland
*They're happy in Italy
*They're happy in Germany
*They're happy in Spain
*They're happy in Sweden
*They're happy in Denmark
*They're happy in the USA & Canada
*They're happy in Norway & India
*They're very happy in England (UK) (Loads of Welfare Benefits)

They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!

And who do they blame? Not Islam... Not their leadership.. . Not themselves.. .


And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the
countries they came from where they were unhappy !!!!