Sunday, March 28, 2010

They got the wrong ant hill…

Imagine a small ant hill, about 3/4 of an inch tall, occupied by 32 common ants, never known to bite or sting, who were constructing defenses against the threat next door.  Next door is an ant mound, about a foot and a half tall, occupied by thousands of a new specie of killer fire ants that have a well publicized record of wrecking havoc across the countryside.  The property owner, a farmer, is somewhat fond of insect cultural diversity.  He marshals all his resources, a flame thrower, insecticides, and ant traps and decimates the small ant hill.  After all, the fire ant mound must be protected in the name of insect cultural diversity.

The FBI and ATF are that farmer.  The small ant hill is the tiny Christian militia.  The huge killer fire ant mound is the large festering Islamic population in the region. Janet Napolitano, who issued the priority order for the raid, is the farmers brain.  Pity the poor hapless farmer whose brain suffers from a form of small-ant-ziety complicated a debilitating phobia against kicking the fire ant mound.

HERE is the real story, no less perverse. And here is the take from Atlas Shrugs, another conservative web site.

Ask yourself these questions:  Did these so-called “Christian Terrorists” harm anyone yet, never mind kill scores of people?  Do they have any prior record of terrorism?  Compare this with Islamic terrorists in this country who have a well-documented record of carrying out successful terror missions killing dozens, not including 9-11, and tens of thousands world-wide. How is it that the alleged “Christian” group is taken down before they even conduct one “dry run”, while dozens if not hundreds of Islamic terror cells and mosques are indoctrinating and plotting against America amidst a backdrop of numerous successful Islamic terrorist attacks?

One or a combination of the following is probably the reason.

  1. There are infinitely more attempted attacks by Muslims than Christians and by shear force of numbers, several Muslim attacks are bound to be successful.
  2. Muslims are more discreet in their tactics due to their cunning ability of “taqiyya”, the Islamic doctrine of deceit to further Islam.
  3. There is a bias in this nation in favor of protecting the cultural diversity of the Islamic faith, while there is a growing hostility against the Christian faith.

All three reasons are true.

Not meaning to defend terrorists of any stripe, but just pointing out an incongruity:  Don’t you think that with the record of Islamic violence and threats that have already occurred in this nation that our federal government would have different priorities?  I wonder if our government were more focused on addressing the Islamic threat if half of our militias would even feel a need to exist.  If the average citizen really believed we were safe, there would be little reason to take our security into our own hands.  There is an obvious growing distrust in our government to defend the interests of the very ones who feel strongest about the value of our nation.

Actually, I’m leaning toward this whole event being an Obama administration-inspired fabrication to justify their political motives in the eyes of the American people.  I’ll retract when terrorism convictions are upheld, not just weapons violations.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Palin is one of THEM!

Well well well.  It seems that dear Sarah cannot keep her principles intact – just like most of the others.  She had to endorse John McCain for Arizona Senator over J. D. Hayworth.  As you probably know, McCain has been a proponent of legalizing illegal aliens, the immigration “nuclear option” aka “amnesty.”

J. D. Hayworth, who, by the way, has markedly gained in the polls against McCain, has been and remains a staunch proponent of controlling our borders.  Anyone who is endorsed by Joe Arpaio and Chris Simcox is a candidate worth voting for.  Hayworth is.

So, Sarah has sunk to the depths of political back-scratching by her  payback endorsement of McCain, the weak-willed, milk-toast, get along with everyone, conservative flip-flopper.

By the way, while Sarah gives entertaining speeches, her performances do not hold a candle to Mitt Romney’s.  I saw him in person last night giving a stand up one and one-half hour performance “in the round” to a group of 300 or so.  No podium, no notes, no reminders on his hands.  He received applause every 20 seconds and hearty laughs with every political joke he offered.  His book “No Apologies” lays the foundation for his campaign beginning in 2011.  Just for grins, read the acknowledgements section of Romney’s book and compare it to the acknowledgments section of Obama’s book, the “Audacity of Hope.”  Obama audaciously cites left wing radicals, socialists and communists in his while Romney cites patriots, business and economic experts, Christians, and national security experts in his.  What a stark contrast.  How refreshing “No Apologies” is compared to the destructive crap we hear from Obama.

Speaking of books, viscerally  I couldn’t bring myself to part with $20 for Palin’s book.  I couldn’t hold myself back from buying Romney’s “No Apologies.”  “Audacity” was a Christmas gift from my daughter three years ago.  She hasn’t apologized yet.

Friday, March 26, 2010

Wright and Manning: Similarities and Differences

Jeremiah Wright and David Manning: An interesting pair.  Jeremiah Wright is the racist, America-damning Black Liberation Theology pastor Obama sat under for 20 years.  David Manning is the pastor of a church best known for his rant predicting whites rising up and rioting in the streets.

Here are snippets of Jeremiah Wright’s now famous rants against America:

Now watch David Manning’s video HERE.

The contrast between the philosophies of these two men reminds me of a lesson in physics:  For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.  The same principle applies to social philosophy.

In Wright we have a black pastor who is unabashedly racist, dwelling on his condemnation of Europeans, whites, and America for all past sins.  Most of the theological distinctives of his church focus on themes* of…

  • Commitment to the Black Community
  • Commitment to the Black Family
  • Adherence to the Black Work Ethic
  • Disavowal of the Pursuit of "Middleclassness"
  • Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the Black Community
  • Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions
  • Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System
  • Personal commitment to embracement of the Black Value System."

Racist?  Oh yeah.  Imagine a church that used the word “White” instead of “Black.”  And “disavowal of middleclassness?”  What is that about?  Oh, its just the communist principle of a “classless” society.  All workers.  No middle class.  No elites.  No free enterprise.

In Manning we have a similar style of preaching by another black pastor, but the opposite and just as radical message.  By the way, “radical” isn’t necessarily wrong.  It is just not “main stream” or politically correct, at least at the moment.  In the Manning video, we see him playing the role of a prophet, proclaiming the whites have had enough of the Obama “Mack-Daddy” and predicting that there will be riots in the streets as a back-lash against decades of black affirmative action and resource- and initiative-robbing entitlements.  A big difference from Wright is that Manning agrees with those disgusted with the thieving entitlement mentality and would join whitey, in spirit if not in person.  He is not a racist as Wright is a racist.

It is interesting how the hyper-sensitive liberals are all bent out of shape over someone like Manning, but seem to have little problem, in fact, just love a President who sat for 20 years under a man like Jeremiah Wright and who obviously agrees with most if not all he preached during those 20 years. Manning is more likely to be stoned by the intolerant liberals than Wright is by the rest of us.  Manning has already been banned by YouTube.

I am becoming increasingly aware of the similarity in level of rabid intolerance among the left in this country and others, and the intolerance of the defenders and promoters of Islam toward free speech – the expression of of sometimes critical ideas and opinions.  Free speech should not be banned just because you disagree with it.  That is the test of true free speech.  The left and Islam are speaking from the same podium.  I can’t wait for liberals to discover exactly how un-liberal Islam is.  How quickly we will see their cum-by-Yah tolerance vaporize.

If you are curious, HERE are David Manning’s other videos form his website.

*From Trinity Church website in 2008.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Time to vent about Obama again…*

OK.  I admit it.  This “blog” is my emotional outlet when I get frustrated about the cluelessness of our electorate, our nation’s entitlement mentality, the hell-bent desire of our government to be our Mama, and especially now, our Islam-loving, radical socio-Commy President in just about everything he does.    What percentage of the ignorant electorate voted for Obama because they were getting “free money from “Obama’s stash?”

Obama is fulfilling their expectations. Hussein O. is rapidly changing the US into the Obama Mama.  And the arrogant, out of control Congress is facilitating his radical, nation-destroying agenda.

Those who support Obama’s radical agenda will absolutely deserve the consequences of his actions over the next several decades.  Most haven’t been paying attention, they are clueless about this nation’s Christian underpinnings, entrepreneurial history, and legendary individual initiative.  Their own self-indulgences overshadow any capacity to appreciate our history.  Does no one care about the future of this country?  Or is the “now” the only thing that matters?

I have never heard so many folks in their later years express thankfulness that they will not be around to experience the grief that Obamas policies will bring down.  And I imagine the yuppies, gen-X’ers, and the Hollywood and academic elite will be just as glad that the old conservative farts are out of their way so they can party on, unencumbered with their Obama Mama state.  Have fun, children.

* I sincerely hope no ultra-sensitive liberal takes offense at my rant and accuses me of inciting mayhem.  My dad often used the expression “pounding tar” when anyone expressed some inane accusation.  That expression would have some applicability in this case.  Now here is someone who is a bit more excited and a little more animated than I am: David Manning – daring to say what many Americans only think.   A very sensitive liberal friend sent this link to me.  Manning is the right wing equivalent to the left wing black liberation theology racist America-hater Obama spent 20 years with – Jeremiah Wright.  My friend doesn’t realize how really prophetic Dr. Manning might be.  Interestingly, Manning is not the racist Wright is.  In fact Manning would join in with the whites who are livid over what Obama is doing.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

A bad day for America…


  • A day when our Congress gave away our future
  • A day they turned medical care into a government regulated utility
  • A day they adopted socialized medicine
  • A day that begins an exodus of 30% of our doctors from their profession
  • A day Congress co-opted another 16% of our economy to the federal government.
  • A day that adds 30 million people demanding taxpayer-paid medical care
  • A day we entrusted the right to life to an executive order of the most pro-abortion president in our nation’s history
  • A day when a corrupt Congress demonstrated how corrupt they really are
  • A day that will reduce the quality of health care for all Americans
  • A day that eliminates health care as an incentive for productive work for millions of less motivated individuals
  • A day that will generate 100-fold cost increases beyond the trillion dollar estimate, similar in scope to the naive estimates made for Medicare
  • A day that mandates tax increases for products, services, earnings, savings, and investment accounts we never imagined.
  • A day that hastens the bankruptcy and decline of productivity of our nation.

One saving grace:  The 20 and 30 somethings  and others who are preoccupied with self-indulgence and who voted for Obama and this Congress will get what they wished for.  I wish them good luck over their lifetimes.  They will need it.  The cycle of indulgence, depravity, enslavement, struggle, enlightenment and liberty continues. 

So now we are left to wonder:

How will this socialist atrocity affect our economy?  This year?  In 5 or 10 years?  How will it affect different segments of our population:

  • The unemployed
  • Illegal aliens
  • The average working family
  • The retiree
  • The medical profession

How will it affect the quality, cost, and availability of medical care?  How will health insurance companies react?

Can and will this atrocity be reversed in our next Congress after November 2010?

According to Mitt Romney, it will be…

Monday, March 22, 2010

A Campaign Begins Today   [Mitt Romney]

America has just witnessed an unconscionable abuse of power. President Obama has betrayed his oath to the nation — rather than bringing us together, ushering in a new kind of politics, and rising above raw partisanship, he has succumbed to the lowest denominator of incumbent power: justifying the means by extolling the ends. He promised better; we deserved better.

He calls his accomplishment “historic” — in this he is correct, although not for the reason he intends. Rather, it is an historic usurpation of the legislative process — he unleashed the nuclear option, enlisted not a single Republican vote in either chamber, bribed reluctant members of his own party, paid-off his union backers, scapegoated insurers, and justified his act with patently fraudulent accounting. What Barack Obama has ushered into the American political landscape is not good for our country; in the words of an ancient maxim, “what starts twisted, ends twisted.”

His health-care bill is unhealthy for America. It raises taxes, slashes the more private side of Medicare, installs price controls, and puts a new federal bureaucracy in charge of health care. It will create a new entitlement even as the ones we already have are bankrupt. For these reasons and more, the act should be repealed. That campaign begins today.

— Mitt Romney is the former governor of Massachusetts and author of No Apology.

Here are my concerns posted last December.

Friday, March 19, 2010

A perfect match: ABC and Amanpour

Islamofascist-oblivious ABC hires Islamofascist-promoter Amanpour.  Amanpour is best known for her recent CNN series on Islam “God’s Warriors”, where she portrayed that fascist ideology as just another persecuted religion.  A perfect matchup for ABC’s new Islamic-morphing logo.IMGP6495_edited-1
Christiane Amanpour has been named the new anchor of "This Week," ABC News President David Westin announced today.

"I am delighted to announce that Christiane Amanpour will join ABC News as the new anchor of "This Week," Westin said in an e-mail to the ABC News staff. "A highly respected journalist recognized around the world for her reporting, she brings to her new position a wealth of experience and knowledge, as well as a deep commitment to bringing news of the world to the American people."
Westin said Amanpour will appear on other ABC News programs and platforms to provide international analysis on the issues of the day, as well as anchor primetime documentaries on international subjects for the network.
This may be a partial explanation of Amanpour’s outlook on life:
Shortly after her birth in London, her father Mohammad – an Iranian airline executive – and her British mother Patricia, moved the family to Tehran. [Wikipedia]
Right after 9-11, Amanpour explained to the world that the word “Islam” means “peace” when in fact it means “submission.” But most of the media bought her well-placed deception.
Expect more of the same Islamic hocus pocus from ABC.
Technorati Tags: ,,,

Amanpour in September 2011 had Islamic supremacist stealth moderate Reza Aslan on her show along with Robert Spencer.  She made sure things went Aslan's way during the interview.  Read halfway down this link to the point begining with "Note also the "objectivity" of "journalist" Amanpour, who promised him he would have an opportunity to smear me."  Amanpour's pro-Islam, pro-stealth Jihad agenda becomes apparent.  Amanpour is clearly "one of the them" - one of this nation's seditionists.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Is Obama Naive or Malevolent?

Many wonder whether Obama as our President is well-intentioned but merely inept, ill-informed and naive.  Or if he is something worse?

It is possible he has “good intentions”, but they simply do not jibe with what most of America believes is the right course and proper methods.  It is obvious he is on a different wave-length than most of us as regards his methods in the realm of economics, his vision for the role of the federal government, and his priorities regarding our national security.  But he persists, urged on by his cadre of leftists, socialists, communists, and America-haters.

It is also possible that he really does not have good intentions for America as we have known her.  He and his wife have made their disdain for the present and historical America quite clear in their books and speeches prior to the election.  He has made his disdain quite clear in his associations with other America-haters and revolutionaries for the 20 years leading up to his Presidency.  These sentiments and associations are clearly in the public record.

What is also clearly in the public record is Obama’s affinity toward Islam.  He was born Muslim.  He was raised Muslim.  He attended an Islamic school in Indonesia where he was taught from the Quran.  While in college he asserted his desire to abandon his childhood name of Barry Soetoro in favor of the decidedly Islamic name of Barack Hussein Obama. 

Changing ones name is generally not all that significant.  But in the case of Obama, it was.  His father, stepfather, brother and grandfather were Muslims.  When his father, Barack Obama Sr., died in 1982, the family insisted on a Muslim burial. Obama’s grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, from whom Barack was given his middle name, was fiercely devoted to Islam.  Obama’s stepfather Lolo was a practicing Muslim.  Barack was drawn to the writings of Malcom X, the Muslim founder of the militant Nation of Islam.  Obama fondly described “Malcolm’s discovery toward the end of his life, that some whites might live beside him as brothers in Islam, [that he] seemed to offer some hope of eventual reconciliation.”  Obama was “baptized” in Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC), but his baptismal record, if it exists, has not been released. TUCC is Rev. Wright’s racist, black nationalist, America-hating church where Obama spent 20 years. Obama declared that “The person who made me proudest of all was [my Muslim brother] Roy. He converted to Islam, and has sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol.”  Obama described the Muslim call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”  Obama declared that “I will stand with them [Muslim immigrants in the US] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”  He has stood in the midst of Muslim nations apologizing for all of the sins of America.  This list could go on.

Why focus on Obama’s affinity toward Islam?  What does that have to do with the policies he is promoting? 

What is one of the major objectives of Islam in general and al Qaeda in particular?  To destroy America’s economy and render it a defenseless entity so Islam can achieve its historical dominance in obedience to Allah. 

Many have suggested that Obama is destroying our economy by adding trillions to our long-term national debt.  Many have suggested Obama is degrading our national security by his foreign policy, his handcuffing the CIA, his trying of Navy Seals, his requirement for Miranda rights to be given to enemy combatants, and his removal of the missile defense shield in Europe.

Are these actions bourn out of Obama’s naiveté or by his malevolence toward this nation – enhanced through his affinity with Islam? Is it a mere coincidence that what Obama is promoting is one and the same as what Islam desires for us?

Sunday, March 07, 2010

Obama’s “Muslim Nation” Fantasy

The following is from an anonymous source but nails the wishful, imaginative Islam-loving predisposition of Obama:

Barack Obama, in his Cairo speech,  said: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story."


Dear Mr. Obama:

Were those Muslims that were in America when the pilgrims first landed?  Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day?  Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence? Bill  of Rights?Didn't think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England?  No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America?  No, they did not.  In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed slaves."  Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country?  Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era? Again, not present.  In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture.  So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband.  Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they?

Where were Muslims during World War II?  They were aligned with Adolf Hitler.  The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews and promoted their extermination as they still do today.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001?  If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East.  No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day.   Or were those who were rejoicing just reminding us of the many sins of our “evil empire” as American-haters are prone to do.

Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses you bent over backwards  to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11.  To many Americans – and in the heart of their Islamic faith - their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America.

Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates.  They were Muslim, as are most of Somali pirates today.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That, Mr. Obama, is the "Muslim heritage" in America that continues to this day.

“Arrogant, ignorant, deceived, destructive” are words that come to mind when I think of this president.