Wednesday, March 25, 2015

The Limits of Religious Accommodation…

Being a Christian in a (some say) “Christian nation”, I have come to expect my employer, school, community, state, and nation to accommodate my beliefs by recognizing Christian holidays and accommodate my beliefs.  It helps that my beliefs have been molded by not only my religion, but by the 200 plus year moral traditions of my country, and the millennia of traditions of my ancestors from a substantially Christian Europe.

So, is it just Christian accommodation we should expect?  Or is it universal religious accommodation we should expect?  Non-Christians of other faiths expect religious accommodation.  Atheists expect no accommodation for religions.

OK, here’s the rub:  There are religions wherein some of their doctrines, morals, and traditions are illegal based on our Judeo-Christian legal system.  For example, practitioners of Santeria, a Cuban blend of African lore and Catholicism, occasionally make the news. Why?  Because their practice requires the use of animal sacrifices. Many communities tried to outlaw this practice, but the Supreme Court ruled otherwise.  Undoubtedly, PITA was pissed.  Here is a summary of related legal action from Wikipedia:

n 1993, the issue of animal sacrifice in SanterĂ­a was taken to the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah. The court ruled that animal cruelty laws targeted specifically at SanterĂ­a were unconstitutional.[20]

In 2009, legal and religious issues that related to animal sacrifice, animal rights, and freedom of religion were taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of Jose Merced, President Templo Yoruba Omo Orisha Texas, Inc., v. City of Euless. The court ruled that the Merced case of the freedom of exercise of religion was meritorious and prevailing and that Merced was entitled under the Texas Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (TRFRA) to an injunction preventing the city of Euless, Texas, from enforcing its ordinances restricting his religious practices relating to the use of animals,[21] (see Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 110.005(a)(2)) without the court having to reach his claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The city of Euless, even after losing a drawn-out lawsuit that tested the boundaries of religious liberty in Texas, was still searching for new ways to shut down Merced's spiritual practices.[22]

Now comes a tougher religious nut, Islam’s “sharia.”  Should or will the 1,400 year doctrine and traditions of Islam be upheld by our courts on the basis of freedom of religion and “religious accommodation?”  Keep in mind that most of Islam’s religious mandates are antithetical to our own long standing legal traditions, such as:

  • The methods of punishment for laws broken:  chopping off heads, hands, and other body parts
  • The reasons for these punishments:  Converting from Islam to any other, or to no religion; embarrassing or humiliating your family; women not submitting to men in approved ways; insulting Allah, and many others.
  • Many practices that we consider misogynistic.
  • Beheading of gays.
  • Taxation of non-Muslims at a higher rate for their “protection.”
  • Non-Muslims subject to loss of rights held by Muslims – if the Muslims in charge allow their existence at all.
  • Many other Muslim doctrines, laws, and traditions too numerous to mention here that are contrary to our nation’s long-standing religious and cultural convictions and practices.

Which of these “religious mandates” will our supreme court uphold in the name of “religious freedom” or “religious accommodation?”

It is likely that our rapidly growing and influential Muslim population will demand religious accommodation for a number of their “religious” practices.

Image result for accommodating Islam

And if this creates political havoc, the next step will be progressives proposing the elimination of all manner of religious accommodation out of a sense of “fairness.”  Example:  Ok kids, since this piece of poison candy isn’t good for you, you aren’t allowed to have any candy.  Or one plane crash  used as an excuse to prohibit all flights. 

If reason were exercised by our electorate, our leaders, and our courts they would determine that any doctrine, tradition, and law of Islam that contradicts our established legal system and cultural mores shall be unlawful, and promotion of such laws considered as treason or sedition.  But I doubt that will happen.

If reason is applied, Muslims are certain to cry “discrimination against Islam.”  What about  the religious traditions of Santeria that break our animal cruelty laws?

The above conundrum is exactly why Islam needs to be treated NOT as a “religion” in these matters, but as a political ideology, in the same manner as Nazism and Communism.  Islam is an all-encompassing way of life with an overarching legal/political component:  Sharia.  It is so far deviant from our Judeo-Christian tradition and ethics that it is incompatible with and destructive of the legal traditions of our nation and our way of life.

The cultural traditions and doctrines of Islam are the primary motivators (excuses?) for terror and killing in the world in our age.  That should be reason enough to distinguish Islam from virtually every other belief system we must contend with.  Islam is not worthy of “religious accommodation.”

That should also be reason enough to stop the influx of Muslims into this country and to make it clear to Muslims who choose to remain here that they will be subject to the laws of this nation, and not their Sharia.



Obama accommodates Islam by caving into Iranian demands for continuing development of nuclear weapons DESPITE Iran’s leader proclaiming “DEATH TO AMERICA.”  Do you see anything wrong with that picture?

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Not a small minority of “radicals”…

Given that Islam’s premier skill set is deceit, it is no wonder that people who aren’t really paying attention to that religion are deceived.  That skill set is not some recent political strategy adopted by some  radical Muslim offshoot that has nothing to do with Islam.  It is a feature of pure Islam. It has been a core doctrine in Islam from the practice of Muhammad 1,400 years ago down to this very second.  Deceit is taught in Islamic schools, mosques, and Islamic centers.  Deceit is to Islam as the golden rule is to Christians.  It is ingrained in their culture as perfectly normal.

In dozens of nations and thousands of communities around the globe where Islamic populations are dominant, Muslims apply some version of Islamic morality and law (sharia).   If you are a female, gay, infidel, or apostate Muslim, you forfeit your freedoms and possibly your life.   I would think that thoughtful Americans, Brits – heck, all Europeans – would consider Islam a cancer and treat it like they would any subversive organization.  But no.  It is easier to pretend they are just like us and just want to get along.

The “small minority of radicals” that have nothing to do with Islam are on the march.  Their march consists of leaders of Islamic states and their supporters and sympathizers numbering in the millions if not tens of millions of other Muslims that oddly have nothing to do with Islam.  Heck, the entire Islamic religion has been hijacked by a billion Muslims who have nothing to do with Islam!

Western leaders are fools.  As if in a drug-induced stupor, they dismiss facts about Islam and Islamic history.  US leadership wants a treaty with Iran concerning their development of nuclear weapons  They are hoping that Iranian leadership is just like us – morally speaking – and have the same aspirations as we have.  We are fools to think that.

While it is true not every Muslim is a jihadist, most Muslims are either sympathizers or active supporters of Muslims jihadists.  Their doctrine clearly teaches the things the jihadists do.  Their doctrine also teaches two other things:  1) They are called to support the jihadist because it is the right thing to do, and 2) They need to mask their true thoughts, intentions and actions in an infidel culture to defend themselves and to further Islam.  That is “taqiyya.”

The “nice Muslim next door?”  He is either an apostate (not practicing most of Islamic doctrine) or he is practicing taqiyya – most likely the latter if he still calls himself a Muslim.

What about Judhi Jasser, the token peace-loving go-to Muslim on Fox news?  He is an apostate.  He goes against the flow of not only the majority of Islamic texts, but against the teaching of nearly every mosque in this nation and the world.  That is, unless he himself is also practicing his own rendition of taqiyya:  a foil to attempt to deceive Americans that Islam is something that it is not – like the front man in a Ponzi scheme.   We are deceiving ourselves to wishfully think that Islam can be transformed into something it never was – at least not within the lifetimes of our grandchildren and beyond. 

Small minority of radicals?  I have undergone a progression of understanding of Islam since 9-11:

Before 9-11:  I knew nothing about Islam, or at best, that it was just another religion.

Weeks following 9-11:  I started researching.  I was initially influenced by the words of George Bush I, that “Islam is a religion of peace” and by Karen Armstrong who is an apologist for Islam.

I began reading and gathering facts about Islam from a variety of sources.  The most common source was the media at large that continued to offer the Karen Armstrong and George Bush version of Islam.  But soon I began balancing those sources with others such as Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Spencer – and later many more.  These sources actually presented facts about Islamic beliefs and value systems.

Eventually, the facts gained a lot more credibility in my mind than the fluff presented by people who “knew a nice Muslim next door.’'  (Or in the case of George Bush, who probably had a know-nothing apologist for Islam, or perhaps Muslims in the State Department as his advisors on Islam.)

A few months after 9-11 I accepted the idea that there is a “radical” component to Islam and that most Muslims don’t abide by that radical flavor.

It didn’t take me too many years (I guess I’m a little slow) to do some math on Islam.  Of the 1.6 billion Muslims on earth and a mere 10% being radical (meaning they would commit violence to further their cause), that means there are “only” 160,000,000 radical Muslims.

And one third of US Muslims support Islamic terror.  The percentage is probably much higher.  What self-respecting taqiyya-inspired Muslim would tell a US pollster what he really believes?  The 19% above probably refers to the broader US population of progressives, liberals, fascists, and socialists who thrive on chaos to gain more power.


Since I do believe in the evolution of thought and learning, it took me a couple more years to realize that it takes a number of non-jihadists to be eyes and ears, provide political cover, mentoring, teaching, logistics, training, and funding for the jihadist effort.  That understanding led me to a new calculation of jihadist supporters that likely doubles or triples the number of front line jihadists.  That upped the number of supporters to close to half a billion – probably more.

More recently, considering the likes of Obama who clearly supports the Muslim cause (whether he is Muslim or not, he is doing what a Muslim would do), I remembered his words from his book “Audacity of Hope.”  He was emphatic that he would side with [Muslim immigrants] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. This declaration added more light to my understanding of an even more widespread Muslim support for violent jihad – the Muslim sympathizers.

There are those we call “cultural Muslims”, or “casual Muslims”, or “peace loving Muslims” which some believe make up the majority of Muslims.  This Muslim majority, as Obama claimed he would do, will likely side with the doctrines of orthodox Islam, the “radicals”, the military wing of the Islamic ummah, if the winds shifted in an ugly direction - from their perspective – meaning if the rest of us woke up to understand what Islam is all about and attempted to do anything about it.

So no, the Islamic threat is not merely from a tiny minority of radicals who have nothing to do with Islam.  The threat comes from the greater majority of those who claim Islam as their all encompassing model for life and morality following in the path of Muhammad.  Study the life of Muhammad if you want a clue of what faithful, devout orthodox Muslims have in store for the infidel.


Related:  See where pro-Islamic Tweets come from – you may be surprised.

Tuesday, March 03, 2015

What a breath of fresh air and sanity…

I listened to Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to the joint session of the US Congress (presentation linked below).

What a breath of fresh air after being subject to the stench of insanity foisted on the American citizens by our own political leader.

This man made sense.  Our man makes little sense and mocks the intelligence and sense of right that most of us innately possess.

His words provided a ray of sunshine and rational hope – not the false hope of the dark side we have to endure for another year and a half.

Listen and determine if you agree that the words spoken here reflect reality and sound logic and not the counter-intuitive, anti-American blather we usually hear from our Trojan horse in Washington: 

Here is the full transcript of the Prime Ministers speech to Congress.



Why Obama dislikes Netanyahu.  If it is not Obama’s affinity for Islam, then it is this…

Those who do not confront evil resent those who do.

Read more at:


Wednesday, February 25, 2015

A Message to President Obama from a former Muslim

If you want to hear pure logic and an educated list of facts that confirm ISIS represents pure Islam, this is the video to watch.

ISIS is not an aberration or perversion of Islam.  ISIS is Islam as taught by Muhammad and as expressed in the Qur’an.

You draw your own conclusions, after listening to this video, as to whether ISIS is totally Islamic.  Then ask yourself why anyone would attempt to convince us it is not.  What are their motives?



Sunday, February 22, 2015

Promoting jobs for jihadists is like suggesting abstinence for addicts

Or even more to the point, the idea of economic  prosperity is exactly what the resurgent Islamic ideology is against.

Obama and his junior varsity State Department don’t get it.  They are stuck in a Westernized mindset.  They believe that health and wealth is a universal ideal.  They fail to appreciate the fact that in some ideologies at some points in time there arise other priorities.  At this time in Islamic history, as in most periods of its history since its founding, Muslims number one priority is to destroy the wealth of others.  And that priority does not include their desire to be smitten by job opportunities.

One of their principle recruiting mantras is the un-allahness of western wealth.  They have joined hands with leftists and Communists like Obama and the 99%-ers who find it more satisfying to destroy prosperity than participate in it.

The companion motivation is to portray themselves as defenders of the moral high ground.  They see the West and Christiandom as immoral and corrupt.  They point to our obsession with entertainment, our promotion of homosexuality, our pornographic media and related favorite pastimes of our culture as things greatly displeasing to allah.  That justifies to them their moral superiority and motivates them toward their holy war against us. 

They don’t have time for jobs.  The mere suggestion of “better jobs” to most of the jihadi types is like throwing gasoline on a fire.  It is an attack on their Islamic sensibilities.  Jobs and economic prosperity are the very things they are crusading against.

The evidence for this diagnosis lies not only in their doctrine and history of conquests through North Africa and Europe, but in their current reign of terror.  Their destruction of the World Trade Center was symbolic of their motivation:  destroy symbols of prosperity and economic wealth.

Image result for jobs for muslims

The latest demonstration against symbols of Western prosperity is al-Shabaab’s plan to attack the Mall of America located in Bloomington, MN, an urban suburb 8 miles south of Muslim-infested Minneapolis. These fine, job-seeking souls have published their intent in a video as described on FOX HERE.  And more from Pam Geller HERE and Front Page Magazine HERE.

This threat highlights the fact that our intelligence agencies have little clue as to who comes to our nation:

Jim Kallstrom, the former assistant director of the FBI’s New York office, said the FBI has a “huge job in front of them.

“You look at the Mall of America, you look at all the malls then you start to backtrack and say you know it would be nice if we knew what comes and goes into the country,” Kallstrom told Fox News on Sunday. “We don’t have a clue.”

These are not “job seekers” in Syria or Libya or Somalia.  These Muslims are located in one of the more prosperous urban areas in the United States.   And this location also happens to be one of the most heavily Muslimized regions in the US.  Given that the US Census is prohibited from counting people based on their religion (a deadly blind spot in our planning for attacks) estimates of Muslim populations in any US location is difficult as described by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis HERE.

The Mall of America employs 11,00 year round.     They have dozens of  job openings provided on THIS web site.  This does not include openings in individual stores.

But no. These jobs are not what Somalian Muslims of Minneapolis really want.  They want to destroy the jobs, the symbols of western decadence.  They have an agenda that does not match the agenda of the West.  They already have great, motivating jobs, thank you.  They have jobs that plot and deceive and destroy.

We are so damned prideful that we believe every other God forsaken culture in the world wants what we want.  False!  That strategy is causing us to waste billions of dollars and thousands of lives because it does not address the motivation of our enemies.  It only incites them to more acts of terror and carnage.

How about we worry about getting jobs for Americans who want them, and deport the Somalians who don’t.

Speaking of jobs for jihadists, below are State Department job applications that are just now starting to pour in – thanks to Tyler Durden at :

(If only they were this obvious.  But then again, the obvious doesn’t matter.)

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Obama’s speech: Words of an Advocate and Deceiver for Islam…

Imagine this:  If Catholics or Presbyterians were responsible for 99% of worldwide terror, and members of that faith were an immanent threat to our national security, would we tolerate a political leader demanding that we refrain from judging or being critical of those religions.

Such a leader would be called an apologist, an advocate, and a fool.

And so Obama is.

Not one word about positive action we can take to identify and neutralize terror.  Only that we should accommodate them with our sweetness and light.

A fool.

Muslims in the US will most likely be offended by Obama’s words.  Why?  Because he is telling Muslims what not to believe that their religion clearly tells them to believe.  Half the Qur’an (the most relevant half) instructs Muslims to behave exactly how the “radicals” are behaving.  Obama is once more providing cover for a vile, aggressive, intolerant political ideology.

And the rest of us should be offended because our president continually inferred the American public is the cause of Islamic violence.

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

We know why Obama does what he does; but why does the electorate do what it does?

The vinyl fence in my back yard has a lot of mildew on it because most of it is in the shade of a good-sized Oak tree.  I finally found a product that easily eliminates that mildew.  Its label says it “attacks mildew at its roots.”

Apparently cleaners that DON’T attack the root don’t work as well or at all.

The same can be said about Obama’s failing Middle East and national security policies.  He views the problem as “work place violence” or “lone wolf attacks.”  He will use every trite label and excuse to avoid identifying the root cause.  Those sloppy characterizations of universal Islamic terror provide the basis for other erroneous conclusions.  For example, his State Department suggests lack of job opportunities as a root cause of ISIS recruitment success.  That might be true if the hate, attacks and terror were coming from a wide array of ideologies held by people equally pissed off at the lack of job opportunities.  But the hate, attacks and terror come from one single ideology:  Islam.  Our university-brainwashed State Department atheists cannot grasp the concept that there exists societies and belief systems that value other things higher than a good job and a middle income, consumption-driven lifestyle.  Middle East Muslims don’t fancy after the same things we do.  They might even be several generations away from appreciating the golden rule versus their favored “do unto others before they do unto you” mentality.

Retired Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden believes Obama is trapped by his own words on Islamic terror.  But the General falls short of the one essential ingredient that motivates Islamic terror:  Islamic doctrine.  It is not simply “radical Muslims” inventing their own doctrine apart from Islam.  It is orthodox, fundamental Islamic doctrine that they follow.  That is the root of the problem.

Islam is the common denominator; the root of the problem.  Yet Obama remains in denial.  The Atlantic monthly takes several pages to attempt to explain the reasons for Obama’s denial HERE.  I will explain in one sentence.

Obama was raised Muslim, went to Muslim schools, his father and many close relatives were Muslim, he attended a church for 20 years that favored Islam over Christianity and consequently his entire world view is formed by and based on his Muslim experience.

From Qur’an 3:185 aka “taqiyya”

Deception and defense of the faith are key aspects of Islam.  That is why Obama’s incessant and illogical denial that Islam has anything to do with rampant Islamic terror in the world is his mantra.

Many of us knew these traits of Obama a few years ago.  The more difficult question for me, today, after two elections and dozens of gaffs and missteps, is why do 50% of the electorate still  approve the job Obama is doing? (Both Gallup and Rasmussen as of February 17, 2015) 

Here is what I believe is the root of this problem:  Corrupted human nature.

Here is an example:

Assume two equally competent politicians (I know, I know – that’s a stretch, but bear with me for this example).  One is particularly skilled in schmoozing – he is full of charisma, but has a tendency to shade the facts to tell people what they would like to hear.  The other is particularly skilled at getting, understanding and explaining the facts and likely solutions, but is weak in the charisma department – but insists on telling of things the way they are.  Who will be the more successful politician?  “Cool” wins over “competence.”

That is what we have today and have had since humans roamed the earth.   The Obama/Romney race gave us a front row seat to that dichotomy.

This raises another, more fundamental question in my mind:  How did the human race survive as long as it has given our tendencies toward avoiding facts and truth and preferring lies and excuses?  The only thing that comes to mind is that the balancing forces of hormones, sex, and reproduction maintain our existence despite our predisposition to be liars and deceivers. 

That is a major reason why the Muslim birth rate has to be as high as it is.

There you have it – the root of the problem.

Thursday, February 05, 2015

What it takes for Islam to be “moderate” in Jordan

On his flight back home from his visit with President Obama, Jordan’s King Abdullah ordered the hanging of two of Jordan's Muslim ISIS prisoners in retribution for the Muslim ISIS burning of one of Jordan’s captured pilots.  Jordan also upped its aerial bombing campaign against ISIS targets in Syria and possibly also in Iraq.

Jordan is predominantly Sunni Muslim, as is Syria.  ISIS is said to be a radicalized version of Wahhabism, itself a reform movement of Sunni Islam. It can also be said that ISIS is a purer form of Islam than that which is allowed to be practiced in Jordan.

The idea of Jordan bombing fellow Sunni Muslims in Syria, as well as a chunk of Jordan’s population being Palestinian who hold a grudge against Jordan for being too “pro-West”, caused me to wonder about Jordan’s future.

How does Jordan control its Muslim population?  How does Jordan prevent the “radicalization” – or, more accurately, the pure Islamification - of its Muslim population?

The answer:  By means similar to the way the Nazi’s controlled Christianity in Germany:  By buying off and controlling its clergy.

THIS ARTICLE in the Washington Post describes the types of rules Jordan’s government imposes on Muslim clerics.  The clerics are urged (required) to “preach moderate Islam” (what is that, really?) or else “you will not be let back in” [to the clergy].  Jordan prosecutes Islamic State recruiters and cracks down on anyone waving an Islamic State banner.

Jordan also has 60 monitors of its 5,500 mosques that hold Friday sermons.  Officials say they need 400 to do the job adequately.   From the article:

Specifically, Jordan is demanding that preachers refrain from any speech against King Abdullah II and the royal family, slander against leaders of neighboring Arab states, incitement against the United States and Europe, and sectarianism and support for jihad and extremist thought.

The reward for Muslims adhering to the new guidelines are:

  • government salaries of about $600 a month,
  • religious workshops,
  • travel assistance for pilgrimages to Mecca, and
  • weekly guidance.

This is great for the United States, and of course the US applauds this approach to maintain a moderate, if not false, Islam in Jordan.

More to the point, the aura of a “moderate Islam” can only be maintained through coercive state control.  Orthodox Islam does not like to be controlled and told how long its sermons should be or what its followers should think, say or do.

I will not be surprised if Jordan’s attempts to maintain a false “moderate Islam” fail by being overthrown by the orthodox wishes of its Sunni Muslim population – even within the year.  And I would not be surprised if in the background, the Obama administration facilitates that outcome as it has done in other Muslim countries where pure Islam was held in check.

Noteworthy is the fact that Christianized nations do not have to control Christians from being “radicalized” because radicalized Christianity is the polar opposite of a radicalized Islam.  Radical Christianity would promote a life of prayer, tolerance, forgiveness, peace, and giving of self for others.  Radical Muslims pray, true, but are intolerant, unforgiving, terrorists, and give of themselves by being human bombs to kill on behalf of an intolerant god.

Obama At National Prayer Breakfast: ’People Committed Terrible Deeds In The Name of Christ’

 …a moronic attempt at moral equivalency between Islam and Christianity

The above headline appeared on the Brietbart web site HERE with the article quoted in full below this commentary.

I’ve encountered similar claims mostly from liberals (occasionally by others) ignorant of Islam and its history.  They usually have an agenda against all religion or are defenders of Islam.

Here is my reaction to Obama’s comments:

Where to begin.

First, Obama is a disingenuous lying tool twisting facts and religion to suit his own purposes of defending and promoting Islam.

Second, the Crusades he referred to BEGAN AFTER 400 years of Islamic persecution, attacks, and conquests.  Christians of the day observed a huge amount of patience and restraint.  Even then, there were a fraction of counterattacks carried out by Christians compared to the number of initial Islamic attacks and conquests. (Check out the video at the end of this blog.)

Third, Islam has immutably built into its religious/ideological/political texts commands of hate, superiority, intolerance and conquest. What Muslims are known for today (jihad, terror and intolerance of other faiths) is their practice of ORTHODOX Islam, the manner in which Muslim leaders and followers have been practicing what Muhammad practiced and taught since its inception 600 years after Christ.

Here is one current example from Newsmax…

ISIS has established a near-impregnable base of support within Iraq and Syria with spectacular appeal to many of the world's Sunni Muslims, according to a new analysis relying on dozens of interviews with jihadists and U.S. military experts. The group uses certain texts and in-house clerics to provide religious justification for their violence, particularly a book called "The Management of Savagery," which argues that overwhelming brutality is a useful tool in confronting the United States. [Full Story]


"These beliefs are not on the margins -- they are absolutely mainstream. They are preached by mosques across the world, particularly in the Middle East.”

From the new book "ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror"


Any violence Christians have practiced in the name of Christ has been either random outlier events counter to the orthodox teachings of Christianity, or were performed in a relatively brief period of history to defend their existence following 400 years of Muslim attacks and conquest.

Do Christians say and do things because “God told them to?”  Of course they do.  But the history of what Muslims have done and what Christians have done in the names of their respective religions are starkly different.  What is more significant is what each religion’s texts, orthodoxies, and leaders say they should or should not do.

Why would Obama attempt this comparison?  To defend Islam, of course.  His second “slip of the tongue” concerning as he put it a few years ago, “my Muslim faith”, occurred during the prayer breakfast when he said,

“We are summoned to push back against those who would distort OUR RELIGION for their nihilistic ends.”

The “our religion” that he feels summoned to push back to defend is Islam.

Bottom line:  In Islam, violence, intolerance, jihad, terror, and conquest are orthodox - the norm - throughout its history.  In Christianity these behaviors are the exception throughout its history.
Obama is a jackass trying to portray the beliefs of these religions in terms of moral equivalents. They are morally opposite belief systems.

It is heartening to see the huge number of comments to this article on the Breitbart web site who recognize Obamas attempts at moral equivalency and Christian bashing.

Here is the Breitbart article in full:

At the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama reminded attendees that violence rooted in religion isn’t exclusive to Islam, but has been carried out by Christians as well.

Obama said that even though religion is a source for good around the world, there will always be people willing to “hijack religion for their own murderous ends.”

“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Obama said. “In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

Obama also denounced Islamic State terrorists for professing to stand up for Islam when they were actually “betraying it.”

“We see ISIL, a brutal vicious death cult that in the name of religion carries out unspeakable acts of barbarism,” he said criticizing them for “claiming the mantle of religious authority for such actions.”

For those wanting a refresher on the sequence of events surrounding the Crusades, take 45 minutes to view this video by Bill Warner showing exactly what led up to the long overdue response of Christians in the face of 400 years of Islamic conquest.  His website is

Tuesday, February 03, 2015

The Southern Poverty Law Center: A hate group demonizing patriotism and family values

I knew the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) was left wing, but I didn’t know how far left.  With such a noble sounding name – its words ringing with goodness:  Southern, that’s wholesome and down home.  Coupled with Poverty, it becomes Southern Poverty.  That’s noble.  They try  to overcome poverty in the south.  Law Center:  What can be more upstanding than a “law center.”  Drum roll introducing lawyer jokes.  Well, the first two words are warm and fuzzy.

 Beware of a name.

What does the Southern Poverty Law Center do?  Under its “What We Do” heading, they have these titles, with my subtitle in parentheses:

  • Children at Risk (criminal justice system is too tough on delinquents)
  • Hate and Extremism (any group or individual they disagree with)
  • Immigrant Justice (open the borders and let the taxpayers pay)
  • LGBT Rights (2000 years of Christian morality is “hate.”)
  • Teaching Tolerance (anything goes except what they disagree with)

Let’s just say that the overarching philosophy of the SPLC is just like other left wing groups:  Permissive and tolerant toward what it agrees with and hateful and intolerant of things it does not agree with. 

Just as the ACLU occasionally but rarely defends conservative principles, the SPLC lists several categories of legitimate hate groups such as white and black supremacist groups.  But the great majority of listings of hate groups or persons include those in the following categories:

  • Those legitimately expressing facts about Islam and the threat it poses
  • Those who uphold Biblical principles of morality, especially those dealing with homosexual behavior.
  • Those who are opposed to being overrun by illegals.
  • Those who are more patriotic than they are.

Here are several examples of organizations the SPLC cites as “Hate Groups” as listed on their web site:

America's Promise Ministries

Ideology: Christian Identity

America's Promise Ministry is both a Christian Identity church and a major publisher and distributor of right-wing extremist tracts.

American Border Patrol/American Patrol

Ideology: Anti-Immigrant

American Border Patrol/American Patrol is one of the most virulent anti-immigrant groups around. On the American Patrol website and in self-produced videos, the group rails against Mexican immigrants, accusing them of bringing to the U.S. crime, drugs and squalor and of practicing “immigration via the birth canal.”

American Family Association

Ideology: Anti-LGBT

The American Family Association (AFA) says it promotes "traditional moral values" in media. A large part of that work involves "combating the homosexual agenda" through various means, including publicizing companies that have pro-gay policies and organizing boycotts against them.

California Coalition for Immigration Reform

Ideology: Anti-Immigrant

Claiming an unlikely 26,000 members, the California Coalition for Immigration Reform (CCIR) is headed by Barbara Coe, an angry woman who consistently refers to Mexican immigrants as "savages." CCIR publishes a newsletter, produces DVDs, and links to many other anti-immigrant hate groups.

Family Research Council

Ideology: Anti-LGBT

The Family Research Council (FRC) bills itself as “the leading voice for the family in our nation’s halls of power,” but its real specialty is defaming gays and lesbians.

Federation for American Immigration Reform

Ideology: Anti-Immigrant

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) is a group with one mission: to severely limit immigration into the United States. Although FAIR maintains a veneer of legitimacy that has allowed its principals to testify in Congress and lobby the federal government, this veneer hides much ugliness.


Ideology: Patriot Movement

WorldNetDaily is an online publication founded and run by Joseph Farah that claims to pursue truth, justice and liberty. But in fact, its pages are devoted to manipulative fear-mongering and outright fabrications designed to further the paranoid, gay-hating, conspiratorial and apocalyptic visions of Farah and his hand-picked contributors from the fringes of the far-right and fundamentalist worlds.

The SPLC is quick to label as a “hate group”  and slander any group that does not fit its leftist, socialist, anti-Christian, and anti-patriotism agenda.  In fact, under its listing of Florida hate groups, it lists a ministry of Fort Lauderdale’s Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church as a hate group because it promotes Biblical values – or from SPLC’s perspective, is anti-gay.  “Truth in Action Ministries” has since changed its name to D. James Kennedy Ministries.

The Southern Poverty Law Center lists what it calls Anti-Muslim Hate Groups.  All of the listed groups provide facts about Islam that are ignored by our government and most media but are slandered in SPLC’s depiction.

Here are listed profiles of individuals who the SPLC believes are haters because of the information they provide about Islam:

Even the mild-mannered Dr. Ben Carson made the SPLC’s “hater” list – but pressure forced the leftist amoral SPLC to recant.

Click on any of these names to see what SPLC has to say about them.

I feel slighted.  They left me off their list.  I’ll have to work on that.

This is the politics of slander.  Slander whichever individuals or groups that do not represent your point of view with words like “bigot”, “Islamophobe”, “homophobe”, “hate group”, or “patriot group.”  The winning entry of the slander name game is “Christian Identity”.  Those who overtly practice their Christianity will be slandered with the hate group name of “Christian Identity.”

And this is just the beginning.

For Washington Times and Breitbart comments on the SPLC, click HERE and HERE.

Bottom line:  The Southern Poverty Law Center is itself a hate group and an awesome fund raising machine.