Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Beware of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a great name.  Any organization that has the words “Southern”, “Poverty”, and “Law” in its name must be trustworthy and truthful, right?  WRONG!

In the case of the SPLC, it is a deceitful, distorting, slandering far left organization.  It takes every individual and organization that we see promoting common sense, truth, logic, and American values and condemns it as hateful, bigoted and phobic.

A recent noted case in point is SPLC’s characterization of John Guandolo who is at the forefront of informing our nation of the real threat of Islam.  Here is some of his background from his website, “Understanding the Threat”:

Mr. Guandolo is a 1989 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy who took a commission as an Officer in the United States Marine Corps. Mr. Guandolo served on the Washington Field Office SWAT team for over nine years and as its Team Leader for three of those years. He was a certified Undercover Agent, a Nationally Registered Paramedic, a First Aid Instructor, and served as an FBI “Advanced Capability Medic.” His career included significant overseas travel to include many areas of Africa, Southwest Asia, Europe and elsewhere.

After his FBI career, Mr. Guandolo conducted Strategic Analysis on the Global Islamic Movement for the Department of Defense. Currently, Mr. Guandolo advises governments - U.S. and others - on matters related to National Security, specifically the threat from the Global Islamic Movement. He actively briefs and teaches members of Congress, senior military officials, law enforcement, the intelligence community, key community leaders, and others. Mr. Guandolo served as an adjunct instructor at the Joint Forces Staff College and instructed at the U.S. Army War College.

Here, also is a recent interview with Guandolo by Breitbart.  You compare your understanding of reality with what Guandolo is saying here:

Guandolo:  “Yes, we are at war with Islam”

What does the SPLC make of individuals who dare warn us about the Islamic threat?  Well, of course they slander, lie, demean, and marginalize.  Here is SPLC’s latest slander piece about Mr. Guandolo:

DISGRACED FORMER FBI AGENT JOHN GUANDOLO PROVIDING ANTI-MUSLIM LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING THIS WEEK IN COLORADO

Why does the anti-American SPLC make this claim?  Several reasons:

  1. Guandolo identifies Islamic doctrine that motivates violence by Muslims.
  2. Guandolo connects the obvious relationship between jihad, violence, supremacism, and terror committed by Muslim in the name of Islam with long-standing Islamic doctrine
  3. Guandolo associates and agrees with the likes of Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, ACT for America, Frank Gaffney and Tom Trento.  These are several of the individuals and groups that make the most rational sense about the reality of the threat of Islam that is behind 99% of the terrorism occurring today. 

The SPLC ignores reality and attempts to destroy anyone who is truthful about what we observe happening “in the name of Islam” that matches Islamic doctrine to a “T”.  They call truth tellers “haters.”

Here is what the SPLC is:

    • Pro-Islam, pro-jihad
    • Anti-American
    • Far left
    • Communist-sympathizing
    • Slandering
    • Dissimulating
    • Blind, ignorant, or highly disingenuous
    • A danger to historic American values

Here is a partial list of the individuals and organizations on SPLC’s “hater” list:

    • David Horowitz (Front Page)
    • Frank Gaffney
    • Joseph Farah (World Net Daily)
    • Lt. General Boykin
    • Pamela Geller
    • Robert Spencer
    • Tony Perkins (Family Research Council)
    • ACT for America
    • American Family Association
    • Family Research Council
    • Jewish Defense League
    • National Coalition for Immigration Reform
    • Oathkeepers
    • World Net Daily

Unfortunately, most media, including ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and major newspapers, often quote distortions and slander produced by the SPLC as if they have some special lock on the truth.  Far far from it.  SPLC has a lock only on disinformation and slander.  Their agenda is “see, hear and speak no evil of evil.”  The SPLC is the epicenter of the “hater”, anti-truth, anti-free speech movement.

Friday, December 16, 2016

My take on “Aleppo”, Russian and US Policy…

Ok, I admit upfront that my knowledge and understanding of Aleppo is only marginally beyond the “what is a “leppo” stage.

But I do know several things that convince me that Russia’s actions there are far superior and more effective than those of the United States.  Here is the basis for my observations:

  • US policy in the Middle East has been a failure.  Why? We have made alliances with poorly understood groups with poorly understood motives who are worse than the governments they fought and are fighting.
  • US leaders have failed and continue to fail to understand the depth, influence and significance of Islamic doctrine and culture.  They continue to deny the relationship between the dozens of Islamic terror organization and hundreds of Muslim leaders WITH ISLAM.
  • US leaders fail to admit to the historic and continuing doctrine of mainstream Islam that encourages conquest, jihad, intolerance and supremacism toward non-Muslims and those Muslims who are less “devout” than Muhammad and Islamic texts and leaders demand.
  • Failing these understandings, we have applied half ass’d and failed measures in dealing with Middle East Muslims who we label as “radicals”, “rebels”, and  “freedom fighters” .  We treat them as though they have the same belief system, moral system, sense of respect for life and fairness as most in the West have.  They do not.

Russia, who for  centuries has been closer neighbors with the Muslim hoards of the Middle East than we have been, understands these people better than we do.  They understand what it takes to deal with their leaders.  We consider what Russia is doing in Aleppo, for example, as butchery, heavy-handedness, and atrocity.  Russia more wisely considers their actions to be appropriate, necessary and effective; doing exactly what is required to put a lid on the violence, killing and instability perpetuated by the 1,400 year old Islam-inspired culture.

The US has encouraged and continues to encourage the killing off of leaders and governments that have maintained stability and order in a number of Middle East nations.  We have created a vacuum that enabled the Muslim purists, the devout, to impose conditions much worse than formerly existed.

Russia is drawing the line on that foolishness in Syria. Image result for shrieking little girl They do not want one more nation to fall to instability and chaos.  Syria is their “red line” and they will not let Assad forces fall to even worse, intolerant, unstable Islamic doctrine-led governance.  They realize strength,  force, and in some instances, matching brutality with brutality is required.  Imagine a little girl screaming at her father for beating up the child molester. That is the West.   The West shrieks like a little girl in horror at what Russia and Assad are doing to the “poor” rebels in Syria.  

We need to get over our Pollyannaism and face the reality of the situation there.  Russia has, long ago.

HERE is Pat Buchannan’s column on the same topic.

Friday, November 18, 2016

Finally! A federal government understanding the reality of Islamic doctrine and practice…

It is about time.  And Trump is going to get an earful from the Islamic-pandering and Islamo-ignorant media and other Muslim apologists who defend the indefensible.

General Michael Flynn was appointed to the position of National Security Advisor.  He is the replacement for Susan Rice.  Rice and James Clapper (synonymous with the Johnny Carson/Jack Webb “Copper Clapper Caper” routine) the now resigned Director of National Intelligence, both made a mockery of the relationship between Islamic Jihad, ISIS and Islam claiming that neither Jihad nor ISIS have anything to do with Islam.  Ha ha ha ha ha – LOL, ROTFLOL.

While never a copper, Clapper foisted his pro-Islamic caper on the American people for way too long. Susan Rice was no better.  Thank goodness clueless Clapper called it quits.  And thank goodness we now have someone knowledgeable of and not beholden to Islam.

In fact, General Flynn is such a great appointment (happy days are here again!!!) that he is getting slandered by the ignorant, Muslim-pandering press. 

Here are the contents of a page full of Google searches of “Michael Flynn on Islam”:

 

“I am pleased that Lieutenant General Michael Flynn will be by my side as we work to defeat radical Islamic terrorism, navigate geopolitical ...

Trump Picks Michael Flynn, Harsh Critic of Islam ... - New York Magazine

nymag.com/daily/.../11/trump-picks-michael-flynn-for-national-security-adviser.html
16 hours ago - Donald Trump has offered the position of national security adviser to retired Lieutenant General Michael T. Flynn, according to multiple news ...

Michael Flynn & Islam: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

heavy.com/.../michael-flynn-racism-accusations-donald-trump-controversy-who-is-na...
4 hours ago - Michael Flynn, Donald Trump's National Security Adviser, has extreme views on Muslims and Islam. Here's a look at what Flynn has said in the ...

Michael Flynn, Anti-Islamist Ex-General, Offered Security Post, Trump ...

www.nytimes.com/2016/.../michael-flynn-national-security-adviser-donald-trump.html
18 hours ago - Michael T. Flynn, potentially putting a retired intelligence officer who ... facts: General Flynn, for instance, has said that Shariah, or Islamic law, ...

Trump names Michael Flynn, who has called Islam "a cancer," national ...

https://mic.com/.../trump-names-michael-flynn-who-has-called-islam-a-cancer-nationa...
9 hours ago - Michael T. Flynn — a man who has previously called Islam "a cancer" and declared that he is "at war" with the religion. The appointment was ...

Trump's national security adviser Michael Flynn is anti-Islam, open to ...

qz.com/.../trumps-national-security-adviser-michael-flynn-is-anti-islam-open-to-tortur...
5 hours ago - Three-star US Army general Michael Flynn has ruffled a lot of feathers since he was fired as head of the US Defense Intelligence Agency in ...

Anti-Islam, Black-Ops Master Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn to Likely Head ...

www.commondreams.org/.../anti-islam-black-ops-master-lt-gen-michael-flynn-likely-...
1 day ago - Retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is the "leading contender" to become Trump's national security advisor, one of the top posts in the White ...

5 Points On Trump's Anti-Muslim National Security Adviser Michael ...

talkingpointsmemo.com/.../michael-flynn-trump-national-security-adviser-what-you-...
5 hours ago - President-elect Donald Trump's selection of retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser is the latest indication that he intends to ...

Likely Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn Calls Islam A

www.rightwingwatch.org/.../video-likely-trump-national-security-adviser-michael-fly...
6 hours ago - News outlets are reporting that President-elect Donald Trump has offered the position of national security adviser to retired Lt. Gen. Michael ...

Trump Picks Anti-Muslim Extremist Michael Flynn To Be National ...

www.politicususa.com/.../donald-trump-chooses-anti-muslim-extremist-national-secur...
19 hours ago - Trump's choice of Flynn is unsurprising given the anti-Muslim aura that surrounded the president-elect during his campaign.

 All these media smears of Flynn are good news.  It means Trump’s appointment for National Security Advisor “gets it” about Islam.

But  just like the left’s slander of Trump’s choice of Steve Bannon, the media see fit to smear Flynn with labels of “extreme anti-Muslim”, “anti-Islam extremist” and related derogatory terms.  This is almost enough to cause one to believe that either the media has been infiltrated by a bunch of Muslims, or by a tribe of ‘60’s drug-addled journalists trained by liberal professors who have themselves been brainwashed by Saudi-controlled Middle East Studies programs that whitewash Islam.

By the way, there is nothing “harsh” about telling the truth about Islam and then wanting to do something about it.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

News sites without a “Comments” section…

…are like condescending professorial demigods

Bloomberg, the Washington Post, New York Times, and a number of other mostly liberal establishment news sites do not provide an opportunity for reader comments.  I find this both frustrating and elitist – it is very paternal of them. Image result for gag

This one-way communication may be an old news reporting tradition, but it is outmoded and in many ways disingenuous.  It presumes the reporter, the editor or the owner of the publication is totally unbiased which they most definitely are NOT.

A case in point, Bloomberg explaining the rise of “populism” in their leftist, biased way…

But it’s [populism] also played a starring role in the rise of demagogues and therefore some of the ugliest episodes in human history.

Republican Donald Trump’s electoral-college victory over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton last week was an unprecedented triumph of populism in the U.S.—one that leveraged feelings of victimization by a shrinking white majority who blame lost opportunity on U.S. President Barack Obama, the political establishment, wealthier urbanites, and immigration.

Notice the juxtaposition between “…ugliest episodes in human history…” and the following paragraph about Trump’s election.  Notice use of the words “victimization by a shrinking white majority” and the innuendo of “racism.”

This all deserves comment and rebuttal because those statement are loaded with bull crap.   But no.  Bloomberg doesn’t allow reader comment because they want to be a little demigod, the “all knowing wise college professor.”  How dare we comment on their “final word.”

I find myself increasingly ignoring even reading news articles, which are mostly biased propaganda pieces anyway, from news sites that do not provide for reader comments. 

Isn’t it a coincidence that the great majority of these news sites are “mainstream media” sites, also known as liberal, elitist, establishment and old school.

My greatest wish for these sites is that they wither and die.  I’ll help where I can.

Image result for all knowing professor

All knowing mainstream media

Tuesday, November 08, 2016

Government leeches in big cities and communist intellectuals in college towns give Clinton early lead…

8:00 pm election night:

This is depressing.

Mainstream America, where most of us are productive, hard working, honest, independent, and conservative occupy 90% of the land mass of the nation.

Look at the county electoral maps across the nation.  It is dotted with blue spots comprised of liberal college towns and dense urban centers dominated by those who suck off the government whether by welfare recipients or by big business insiders.

That is what Donald Trump was up against and what gives Hillary Clinton the green light to destroy the rest of this nation.

God help us.

 

How counties across the nation voted.  Red = Trump

 

8:30 pm:  Florida is looking good with 2 Florida Trump counties left to report.

8:45 pm election night:   Wow!  Trump might win Ohio.

8:55:  But NYT predicts Clinton wins the election.

9:15:  NYT projects 279 to 259 electoral votes in favor of Clinton

9:30:  NYT flipped to favor Trump to win the election; so volatile!

9:40:  Trump “very likely” to win Florida, North Carolina and Ohio.  Nationwide, NYT flips back and forth between Clinton and Trump.

9:45:  Wow.  Trump may take Michigan.

10:00:  NYT claims Trump edges Clinton

3:00am:  My brother calls me at 3am to announce Trump’s victory speech!

Sunday, November 06, 2016

Comey does it again! We should now be absolutely convinced the system is rigged…

If we had our doubts whether or not FBI Director Comey was in the bag last July when he first absolved Hillary of all wrong doing, there should be absolutely no doubt remaining now.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3911032/FBI-announces-not-change-decision-regarding-Hillary-Clinton-s-emails.html

After a five day review of 650,000 Hillary emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop, and new evidence that at least 5 foreign nations hacked into Hillary’s ill-conceived attempt to maintain separate servers, Comey and the FBI once again gives her a pass.

I now feel free to go 120 mph in a school zone without any repercussions whatsoever.  Thank you FBI Director Comey for my new found freedom to do anything I damn well please.  And I’m sure you have also given the green light to a few million more formerly law abiding folks to flaunt the law in ways yet unimaginable.  In fact, there is a million times the danger to our national security and public safety with what Clinton did compared to speeding in school zones.

And no, Comey, I do not buy into your newly sanctioned “Two-Tier Legal System.”

Friday, November 04, 2016

Those who vote for Hillary…

People who persist in their vote for Hillary…

  • Don’t believe or don’t care that she is a perpetual liar
  • Don’t believe or don’t care that she was a key factor in the death of dedicated US officials in Benghazi
  • Don’t believe or don’t care that she is a key official in the Clinton Foundation’s influence peddling for profit schemes at the expense of US foreign policy and national security.
  • Don’t believe or don’t care that her closest confidant and advisor, Huma Abedin, has close ties with Islamist individuals and organizations working to impose Islam in the US and worldwide.
  • Don’t believe or don’t care that she is a 30-year career politician who is good at fuzzy platitudes and bad at implementing anything.
  • Don’t care or prefers the success and prosperity of foreign nations, cultures, and ideologies are prioritized over US interests, workers and prosperity.
  • Don’t believe or don’t care that she irresponsibly handles classified documents so carelessly that anyone else would be denied a security clearance – and then lies about it.

Do these people hate this country, its history, its capitalism, its traditional values SO MUCH that they are willing to vote for someone like this?

I guess the answer is “yes.”  That being the case, our country will be in perpetual decline and conflict until we experience a true, full-blown 2nd revolutionary war.  A nation divided against itself cannot stand.  We have half of our population “divided against itself.”  I don’t know if this is due to indifference, ignorance, selfish desire for government to do things for them that they should be doing for themselves, or complicities in a corrupt system for their own profit and power.  Perhaps all of the above.

Time will tell, and probably not much time will be required.

Thursday, November 03, 2016

Hillary’s most trusted advisor: Islamist undercover…

Innocent-looking young lady Huma Abedin, Hillary’s right-hand trusted and loyal aid, advisor, confidant and Muslim.   Who is she really?  Is she one of the alleged millions of “benign” Muslims?

Who Huma is makes the Clinton’s pay-for-play-policy-for-profit, Hillary’s email debacle, and her habitual lying pale by comparison.

It’s ok to me if Hillary chooses to sell her own soul for money.  But it is not ok to me when she chooses to sell out others, and our country.

Before anyone defends Huma and her daughter-like closeness to Hillary, please spend a few minutes on this video…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRu3U-nwyhw

Thursday, September 29, 2016

“If mama ain’t happy, no ones happy”: Sexist Propaganda?

We’ve all heard the expression “If mama ain’t happy, no ones happy”, right?  This sentiment  has been the cultural standard among couples in the US forever.  It has been the “gold standard” of marital relations.  Keep the woman happy and all will be peaches and cream.

So, if the woman whines, we known it is something the man is doing wrong.  We, as men, need to do everything in our power to keep the whining down – keep mama happy.

But…

If the man is unhappy, guess what.  He is just a whiner…spoiled, selfish.  There is something wrong with him. 

There is no male equivalent to “if mama ain’t happy, no ones happy.”  There is no such thing as “if papa ain’t happy, ain’t no one happy.”  This expression is never heard.

This one-sided responsibility for happiness is just one of countless conflicts exposed by the feminist movement.  The evolving culture insists on equal rights for women, yet the prevailing culture still expects superior treatment of women.

The reality: If papa ain’t happy, no one is happy, either. 

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Minimizing the “other side’s opinions”…

I received a comment from a reader who took exception to my blog about a neighbor who characterized Trump supporters as “trailer trash.”   She also objected to my drawing attention to Hillary’s labelling Trump supporters as comprised of a “basket of deplorables.” (See the blog below titled “Attitude against Trump and his supporters.”)

Seemingly out of the blue she said I need to “learn to have a real conversation without minimizing the other side's opinions.”

My critic believes that views about which an individual disagrees should NOT be minimized.

Let’s unpack that admonition a bit.

I agree that if there was a brand new view that I had not yet considered, it would be rash and premature of me to minimize that view.  It should at least be considered, evaluated and either be dismissed, adopted, or put on the back burner for future consideration. 

On the other hand, views that I have already heard, considered and based on solid evidence and experience determined were foolish, ill-conceived, dangerous, or unworkable are the perfect candidates for being “minimized.”   Why?  Because they were already considered and dismissed.  Why shouldn’t such views be “minimized?”  Not “minimizing” views that an individual has already rightly concluded are ill-conceived and which make little sense would be mind boggling.  How can views deemed irredeemable not be “minimized?”  That is just another definition of insanity.

This woman, an educated naval officer, is of the apparent belief that all views, however outrageous, however discredited they may be, should never be minimized.  In her view, all views should be considered as equally valid, equally feasible, equally considered as if they are brand new and have never, ever been considered before – never minimized. 

Such is the view of the newly educated.  To the recent college graduate, everything is so new to them that they cannot fathom anyone “minimizing” a view that they currently believe is immutable.   They cannot fathom the idea that some views are minimized by those who have already found them to be wanting.

This critic admits to being a Hillary supporter.    She apparently thinks its OK for a neighbor to characterize Trump supporters as “trailer trash.”  After all, Hillary confirmed this characterization with her own “basket of deplorables” comment.  So she is very defensive of Hillary and critical of anyone who “minimizes” Hillary’s or her supporter’s bigoted comments.

There are two reasons that come to mind why such person would defend the bigoted comments of Hillary and her supporters:

  • Naiveté. She is a young person recently educated in a liberal college with liberal peers and professors who have not offered the “other side” of any story to her in any positive terms.  It is no wonder that she finds my “listing [of] liberal attributes … confounding and baseless.”
  • Gender.  She is a female who will give deciding points to any other female running for office just because she is female, aka, playing the “gender card.”  It is no wonder that she defends the indefensible - the words of Hillary and her supporters - and is critical of her opponents.

A word about liberals who demand “tolerance.”  They are among the least tolerant of all humans.  Their cry for “tolerance” is a one-way street.  They want everything “tolerated” except the things that they disagree with.  That is the merging of “anything goes anarchy” (extreme libertarianism) with a form of “dictatorial autocracy” where ONLY the views of the supposedly “tolerant” elite are tolerated.  This is an oxymoronic and duplicitous combination.