Sunday, April 03, 2011

Why do we need Al-Jazeera when our media already speaks for Islam?

Here is a must see video where Pamela Geller correctly identifies Al-Jazeera as the public relations and marketing arm of the Muslim Brotherhood and its deceit – the mouthpiece of the Islamic world.  And our government and media are inviting it to America when it should be banned as a subversive organization just as Joseph Goebbels would have been during WWII.

Pamela Geller of describing dangers of Al-Jazeera in America

I would argue that Al-Jazeera joining the ranks of AP, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and sometimes Fox would make little difference in what we hear about Islam.  Our own national networks and news services, generals, and many of our politicians are so smitten with Islam – or loath to tell the truth for fear of reprisal or being called a bigot or Islamophobe -  that they repeat, verbatim, the Islamic propaganda lies that are fed to them by Islamists they mistakenly label as “moderates.”

Here are two examples as brought to our attention by Diana West, author of The Death of the Grownup, from her blog site.

The first example describes General David Petraues in Afghanistan begging us in America to respect Islam’s “Holy Qur’an.”  That book is as “holy” as a pile of sludge in the bottom of a septic tank – and no – I will not respect it for dozens of reasons I have explained elsewhere.  How dare one of our military leaders call a book “holy” that condemns Christianity, Judaism and “unbelievers” to death and serves as the instruction manual for psychotic Muslims the world over.  In a sane world that man would be court martialed for promoting the propaganda of the enemy.  But it is OK in Obama’s world.

The second example describes the idiocy of the New York Times, not much different than most US news outlets, in posting a headline that reads "Afghans Avenge Koran Burning, Killing 12" as if burning a book is a worthy excuse for massacring 12 innocent people.  But of course, the Muslim “Holy” Qur’an teaches that they weren’t really innocent.

Our political correctness and suppression of the truth of Islam is emboldening rabid psychotics whose ideology is based on the Islamic books born out of the of the drug-controlled mind of a 6th century fanatic.  And the mission of Al-Jazeera is to promote that ideology.

The same oppression of free speech was felt by U.S. cartoonist Molly Norris of Seattle, Washington, when she proposed “everyone draw Muhammad day.”  Apparently depictions of Muhammad are explicitly forbidden in a few hadiths.  Well folks, those God-forsaken writings do not represent my religion and I am not subject them, and neither is Molly.   Despite that fact, on the advice of the FBI, Molly Norris had to disappear from view for a time because of her proposal.

I understand many of us think it impolite to draw Muhammad or burn a book when such action may be offensive to others.  But when the offense taken becomes asymmetrical and psychotic out of all proportion to sane, civilized behavior, politeness and respect become submission.  And it is not in our interest to submit to such threats and reactionary behavior any more than giving in to the tantrums of a three-year-old.  But three-year-olds don’t behead people when they don’t get their lollipop.  Which makes it even more urgent on the part of us “infidels” not to be enablers of such intimidation.  I am among the  less cowed and more aware who believe it is more appropriate to fully exercise our right to draw Muhammad and burn what we consider to be unholy and seditious literature.  Let the psychotic Islamic ideologues dance themselves into a self-immolating frenzy – and if they must kill to release their hate, they continue to demonstrate their “holy” book – the source of their psychosis - is truly evil and worth burning. 

But how much psychotic behavior do we have to tolerate before we realize what we’re really dealing with and that our submission is suicidal?

It is clear that our leaders and much of our US population believe that the Islamic culture is more worthy of our defense than our own.  More of this thought here at Winds of Jihad by Shiek Yer’ Mami.

Here is an excerpt:

The reason we’re losing this thing is because of a lack of cultural confidence, of which the fetal cringe of this worthless husk out-parodies anything Coward could have concocted. When I’m speaking on this subject, I often get asked to reprise the words I quote in my book, from Gen. Sir Charles Napier in India explaining to the locals his position on suttee — the tradition of burning widows on the funeral pyres of their husbands. General Napier was impeccably multicultural:

You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows.You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.

No comments: