Obama seeks patriotic, pro-Western, Judeo-Christians in his administration -
Oh wait! Apparently not.
As reported by Robert Spencer on Jihad Watch:
Obama wants more Muslims in his Administration, and to work closely with Muslim community in U.S.
But no worries: his list of potential Muslim appointees has been "carefully vetted." How carefully? We can get a hint of the answer from the involvement of Congressman Keith Ellison (D-MN). Congressman Ellison recently made the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca that is one of the five pillars of Islam. The Muslim American Society paid for his Hajj. And what is the Muslim American Society? The Muslim Brotherhood.
"In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members." -- Chicago Tribune, 2004.
And who is the Muslim Brotherhood? The Muslim Brotherhood "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." -- "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.
Imagine if a conservative Congressman had taken a trip that had been paid for by a Christian group that was, according to one of its own documents, dedicated to "eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house" so that Christian law would replace the U.S. Constitution. I expect we would hear more of an outcry than we ever heard about Ellison's Hajj.
"Obama gets list of top Muslim Americans," from the Denver Post, March 27 (thanks to Pamela):
CHICAGO — In a bid to get more Muslim Americans working in the Obama administration, a book with resumes of 45 of the nation's most qualified — Ivy League grads, Fortune 500 executives and public servants, all carefully vetted — has been submitted to the White House.
The effort, driven by community leaders and others, including U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., was bumped up two weeks because White House officials heard about the venture, said J. Saleh Williams, program coordinator for the Congressional Muslim Staffers Association, who sifted through more than 300 names.
"It was mostly under the radar," Williams said. "We thought it would put (the president) in a precarious position. We didn't know how closely he wanted to appear to be working with the Muslim American community."
This is the type of "Change" I feared Obama would bring to the table. Most Americans believe that violent Jihadists constitute a tiny minority of Muslims. They belive the great majority are peace-loving, patriotic, Christian-like Muslims who are just like you and me. Much evidence points to the fact that this "huge majority" of non-Jihadi Muslims are sympathetic to the aims of the Jihadists. They may not agree with the means and methods, but they most certainly agree with the ends: A nation dominated by Islamic tenets, if not Sharia law. Most are no friend of western values and culture.
A few weeks back, I suggested that most non-Jihadi Muslims were probably merely ignorant of the Islamic-supremicist nature of their religion and of their Holy Book - that they ignorantly believe that Islam is a "religion of peace."
A wise person got my attention when he ask me this question: With the past decade's high profile Islamic-sponsored carnage and public calls for the elimination of Israel and the West, how is it possible for Muslims in this country to be unaware of the violent nature their religion? Who would still lay claim to such a religion unless they agree with at least the objectives of the current driving forces of their religion if not also the means to achieve them? There is no way American Muslims can be unaware that the heart of Islam desires to subvert western culture and values into its own barbaric and fascist image.
Appointing Muslims to high positions in the White House is absolutely in keeping with Obamas past radical associations, his desire for change, his disdain of "traditional America" and her culture, and the agenda of Muslims to remake America in the image of Muhammad.
We can only hope there will be enough of a backlash against this foolishness over the next few years to reverse the damage that is being done to this nation. If not, we totally deserve what we get.
I have to confess, though, I find it absolutely surreal that a man with a Muslim name and Muslim sympathies, having America-hating associates, who has taken over the largest American companies, who has trashed the free-market and capitalism, and who bends over backwards to appoint Muslims to high positions, was elected President ONLY SEVEN YEARS AFTER 9/11! Does anyone else feel this way? What does that say about our electorate? Does the word "gullible" come to mind?