I am being very, very careful not to mention the name of any belief system, group of people, or individual so that I will not upset the sensitivities of snowflakes, leftists, adherents of ***** or Google censors.
So, back to the question I asked in a blog over five years ago that was recently deleted by Google as “hate speech”: “Can ******-free Zones be Justified?”
I must have proclaimed a resounding “you betcha” in my earlier, Google-erased blog, because I guess that’s why they erased it.
Look what happened to our president when he asked the same thing in his attempt to reduce immigration from violence-prone nations that hate the US. He was appropriately trying to make our entire nation a ******-free zone. He got himself impeached. I only got a blog post deleted.
Back to my very clear question: “Can ******-free Zones be Justified?”
Again, you betcha. Why?
If said ****** is a devout adherent to the ******* ideology, and given that the ******* ideology promotes violent supremacism and maintains a doctrinally pure and consistent hatred of the religions and values of western civilization, then yes, you betcha they have no place here. Granted, not all ******* are deeply devoted to the pure doctrine of *****. The trouble is, because of the deep deception practiced by adherents of *****, it is virtually impossible to know which ***** does or does not believe and practice the doctrines of *****.
So, having concluded without any shadow of doubt that ******-free zones are justified, how can we go about accomplishing this? It is obvious that liberal judges who overturned our president’s attempts to at least minimize the invasion of our nation by a force of evil against it are clueless concerning ******* doctrine, history, and practice. So, yes, we need judges who understand the seditious intents and purposes of ******* who devoutly practice *****.
Doesn’t a nation possess the right to admit only those non-citizens who at least don’t hate, if not love this country, to enter into it? Don’t we have the right to identify nations dominated by people possessing hatred for and violence toward this nation and refuse their entry?
So, yes, ******-free zones are absolutely justified: In your neighborhood, town, county, state and nation. Diversity based on gross incompatibility with those who believe in and use violence to further their ends brings nothing but strife and demonstrably deadly consequences.
1 comment:
Very good...and another "you betcha" from me. If ***** were simply another religion, no prob. But it isn't just "another religion." It is a perverse (to our society) alien civilization system that is violently counter to our civil systems. Yes, there should be zones--and in fact entire countries--that are free of them! We don't need Trojan Horses slipping in causing us to constantly look over our shoulder to see what's about to get us. We already have ********* doing that!
Post a Comment