We don’t know who is running this country!

 

Who?  Some say Soros.  Some say Obama.  Some say a corporate cabal.  We don’t really know who is running this country.  We know it isn’t Biden.  He’s just the propped up, empty shell. That was confirmed beyond all doubt on June 27, 2024.

We know the deep state is rife with pro-Palestinians and other Islamists.  We know it’s heavily endowed with Communists.  McCarthy was right in the ‘50’s.  He’d be even more right today.

Who the electorate supposedly “elected”, Biden, is a mere decoy - a puppet.  The Biden voters were duped.

The Biden voter, aka, [mostly] Trump Haters, have been foisting their own fraud on the rest of the nation.  They are defending the lying cabal that is accusing Trump of lying.  Today’s New York Times editorial that calls for Biden to exit the race, is just one example of the many continuing lies and liars against Trump. 

So, who is leading our nation?  Who is pulling the strings?

We are in one precarious pernicious position.

Is a trial by a "jury of our peers" really guaranteed? Or was the concept "bastardized" by the legal profession?

 I was curious.  President Trump was said to have a jury of his "peers." Many believe that guarantee is in the US Constitution.

https://www.usconstitution.net › constnot-html

Things That Are Not In the U.S. Constitution - The U.S. Constitution ...

Jury of Peers. People often say "I have a right to have my case heard by a jury of my peers!" when there is no such right in the Constitution. The Constitution does take up the issue of juries, however. It is the nature of the jury which is not in the Constitution. In Article 3, Section 2,

Nope.  It is there only by inference, primarily in the Sixth Amendment.

Sixth Amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Do you see the word "peer" mentioned?  And worse yet, the "legal" definition is a LOT broader (i.e. "bastardized") compared to the common definition:

Legal definition:  

Definition of "jury of one's peers"

The constitutional right that ensures criminal defendants are tried by an impartial group from the same geographical jurisdiction, consisting of a broad representation of the population, irrespective of their race, national origin, and gender.   https://dictionary.justia.com/jury-of-ones-peers

Common definition:

peer /pîr/

noun

1. A person who has equal standing with another or others, as in rank, class, or age.

   "children who are easily influenced by their peers."  American Heritage Dictionary

 ___________________

one that is of equal standing with another : EQUAL

The band mates welcomed the new member as a peer.

especially : one belonging to the same societal group especially based on age, grade, or status

teenagers spending time with their peers    Webster's Dictionary

So there you have it. The mythical protection of a "jury of your peers."  Good luck surviving a jury trial if you are an elderly conservative Christian Caucasian in a county comprised of young atheist or Muslim indigent illegal immigrant liberals.

Not ONE of Trump's jurors were in any manner an equal with regard to rank, class, age, or socio-economic status, intelligence or any other measure. Trump didn't have a chance in hell of a fair trial by his "jury of his peers."  There was not one real peer there.

One Small Step for Leftists - One Giant Leap Toward Civil War

The Democrats, other leftists and Trump haters scored a victory with the conviction of Trump based on bad evidence, lying witnesses, a jaded legal system, and unethical instructions to the jury by a Judge who publicly vowed to "get Trump."

Yes, this will be appealed.  But it is almost certain that any appeal will not be heard until AFTER the election.  And the appeals will STILL occur in the legally corrupt state of New York.

So, what happens in the meantime, before the election?

What can we expect from Trump supporters?  What can we expect from those who were on the fence and independents?  What can we expect from people who are painfully aware many of our current leaders appear to be purposely destroying our nation?

What is so troubling to me is the legal system that convicted Trump on May 30, 2024, is not limited to New York City.  Many Pollyanna's will excuse this travesty by claiming it is just a New York thing - New York - the Trump hating bastion of the nation. Unfortunately, this is NOT just a New York thing.

This corruption of the legal system is a nationwide thing - occurring in every big city across the continent.  Flash shop lifting mobs are let out before sunset.  Multiple DUI drivers driving with revoked licenses are released.  A woman who stole a police car and ran over a police officer was found "not guilty." 

https://people.com/woman-stole-police-car-ran-over-officer-while-naked-acquitted-insanity-defense-8656104

This disregard for civility and disregard for justice by our legal system has become commonplace.  Criminals caught in the act of violent crimes are released the next day.  Tens of thousands of illegal aliens who are not vetted, with the majority being military aged men, are relocated to small and medium sized towns across the nation in the middle of the night by our Federal Government. They are ordered to report in -  maybe ten years. Who are they?  How many are ISIS and other similarly motivated Islamic sympathizers, MS-13, and other criminals. Most likely, the majority.

The lack of justice promoted by Soros-funded legal systems across the nation is bad enough.   Trump's conviction is a stark reminder that evil has become "good", and good has become "evil."

How much more turmoil with today's legal travesty create across the nation?  While the Pollyannas suggest that a fair and just legal system will prevail, I disagree.  We have instead taken a giant leap toward civil war.

Pro-Hamas university staff and policies: Check source of funding

 Do you wonder why US universities are as pro-Islam/Palestine/Hamas and as anti-Semitic as they are? 

Follow the money.

Do you wonder why Columbia University hired Minouche Shafik an Egyptian, Muslim sympathizer, as its president?

Follow the money.

With over $8 billion coming from Islamic nations to fund US universities, what else would you expect?  It’s likely MUCH more:

Top American Ivy League universities including Cornell and Harvard have received over $8 billion in the last 35 years from Arab countries, a report has revealed.   Daily Mail

And when you see press reports mentioning “Arab” this or “Arab” that, you should interpret that as Islamic/Muslim.

Islamic doctrine promotes jihad of all sorts, also known as “unrestricted warfare.”  What is unrestricted warfare?  As used by China, it is warfare using any and all means from economic, social, legal, trade, politics, elections, protests (both violent and non-violent), media, and internet to accomplish military and political objectives.  That is precisely what Islamic jihad has done since the sixth century.

And that is what Islamic-funded and influenced university leadership, staff and many of its duped students are doing with their unseemly tolerance of student demonstrations and violence.

Many of us cite additional sources of this insanity, such as George Soros or leftist politicians and college leadership.  True to an extent.  But without a doubt most influence, even of the politicians and media, comes from a combinations of China’s “unrestricted warfare” and Middle East/Islamic jihad in the form of more billions than we will ever know.